yes, it appears those two portlets were never migrated. We can discuss the future implementation of Administrative portlets when we start planning for 2.2.4. Agreed. I've created a JIRA issue to track it and assigned it to myself for version 2.2.4:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JS2-1282 -- David On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Mads Orehoj Sorensen <m...@dk.ibm.com>wrote: > The portlets > - org.apache.jetspeed.portlets.selector.CategoryPortletSelector > - org.apache.jetspeed.portlets.security.permissions. > SecurityPermissionsPortlet > > both extends AbstractAdminDojoVelocityPortlet. > > But as you say issue for 2.2.4 > > > > > From: David S Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com> > To: Jetspeed Developers List <jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>, > Date: 28-05-2013 20:45 > Subject: Re: roadmap > > > > > Admin was all rewritten in Wicket in 2.2.x. > > That reminds me: another potential issue for the roadmap - I believe > Wicket > discontinued their portlet support. So yes, I would say this is more of > an > issue to be solved in 2.2.4. > > -- > David > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:50 AM, David S Taylor > <da...@bluesunrise.com>wrote: > > > Admin was all rewritten in Wicket in 2.2.x. So Dojo is not used at all > as > > far as I know > > > > -- > > David > > > > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Mads Orehoj Sorensen > <m...@dk.ibm.com>wrote: > > > >> A lot changed from 0.4 to 1.x (and much will change again from dojo 1.x > to > >> dojo 2). > >> > >> The roadmap includes "Administrative Portlet Improvements" for version > >> 2.2.4, will these improvements build on the 0.4.1 dojo code? or is dojo > >> entirely removed? > >> > >> /Mads > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: David S Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com> > >> To: Jetspeed Developers List <jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>, > >> Date: 28-05-2013 18:35 > >> Subject: Re: roadmap > >> > >> > >> > >> Dojo changed drastically with 1.x. Just upgrading to the latest version > is > >> not going to work. 1.x was not backward compatible 0.4, and would've > >> required substantial investment of code migration to get our 0.4.1 code > >> running in 1.x. If you are interested in doing that, let us know. > >> Otherwise > >> it might be best to remove all Dojo code from j2-admin to avoid > confusion > >> > >> -- > >> David > >> > >> > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Mads Orehoj Sorensen > >> <m...@dk.ibm.com>wrote: > >> > >> > Sorry I wasn't clear. There are dojo dependencies in the j2admin to > the > >> > old dojo (they cannot run on newer dojo versions). > >> > Perhaps it is under "Administrative Portlet Improvements"? > >> > > >> > /Mads > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: David S Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com> > >> > To: Jetspeed Developers List <jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org>, > >> > Date: 28-05-2013 17:25 > >> > Subject: Re: roadmap > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > We dropped the Jetspeed Desktop, based on Dojo, for JetUI, based on > YUI, > >> > in > >> > version 2.2.0. Is there any reason why you would still prefer to work > >> with > >> > the Jetspeed Desktop over JetUI? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Mads Orehoj Sorensen > >> > <m...@dk.ibm.com>wrote: > >> > > >> > > Any chance for > >> > > > >> > > dojo 1.8 / 1.9 in the jetui (jetspeed are based on 0.4.1 which is > 6-7 > >> > > years old). > >> > > > >> > > Best regards > >> > > > >> > > Mads > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > From: Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com> > >> > > To: jetspeed-dev@portals.apache.org, > >> > > Date: 28-05-2013 15:00 > >> > > Subject: Re: roadmap > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Any chance of Spring 3? > >> > > > >> > > Ron > >> > > On 27/05/2013 10:10 PM, David S Taylor wrote: > >> > > > I updated the roadmap, it was a bit too aggressive. This revision > >> > tries > >> > > to > >> > > > keep 2.2.3 release confined to a theme of "upgrading to latest > >> > > versions..." > >> > > > mainly: > >> > > > > >> > > > - Java 1.6 > >> > > > - Tomcat 7 > >> > > > - Servlet 3.0 > >> > > > - Maven 3 > >> > > > > >> > > > I also added JBoss AS 7 as an intended target, as I believe it is > a > >> > very > >> > > > good release of their application server and deserves attention. > If > >> > > JBoss > >> > > > proves to be too difficult to integrate with, I may back off. > >> > > > > >> > > > http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/roadmap.html > >> > > > > >> > > > The roadmap is a starting point. Of course, please add any task > or > >> > > feature > >> > > > you' d like to implement or sign up for an existing one listed. > The > >> > > > timeframe is the dates I'd like to hit, we all know how that goes > in > >> > > > reality. For the health and future of the project, I believe we > >> should > >> > > try > >> > > > to release twice per year. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > David > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Ron Wheeler > >> > > President > >> > > Artifact Software Inc > >> > > email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com > >> > > skype: ronaldmwheeler > >> > > phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscr...@portals.apache.org > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > jetspeed-dev-h...@portals.apache.org > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Medmindre andet er angivet ovenfor: / Unless Otherwise Stated > Above: > >> > > IBM Danmark ApS > >> > > Nymøllevej 91 > >> > > 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Danmark > >> > > CVR nr.: 65305216 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Medmindre andet er angivet ovenfor: / Unless Otherwise Stated Above: > >> > IBM Danmark ApS > >> > Nymøllevej 91 > >> > 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Danmark > >> > CVR nr.: 65305216 > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> Medmindre andet er angivet ovenfor: / Unless Otherwise Stated Above: > >> IBM Danmark ApS > >> Nymøllevej 91 > >> 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Danmark > >> CVR nr.: 65305216 > >> > > > > > > > > Medmindre andet er angivet ovenfor: / Unless Otherwise Stated Above: > IBM Danmark ApS > Nymøllevej 91 > 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Danmark > CVR nr.: 65305216 >
