> Is the code in the portlet_api branch to be considered a
> "reference implementation"?
Yes.
> I also take it the current plan is to move Jetspeed to the new API
> in the 1.3a3 timeframe, rather than move onto Jetspeed 2?
Yes.
Best regards,
Thomas
Thomas Schaeck
Portal Architect
IBM Pervasive Computing Division
Phone: +49-(0)7031-16-3479 Mobile: +49-(0)171-6928407 e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49-(0)7031-16-4888
Address: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032
Boeblingen, Germany
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/01/2001 04:04:49 PM
Please respond to Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Thomas Schaeck/Germany/IBM@IBMDE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache Jetspeed Portlet API 2
So, is the Portlet API in the CVS the best reference copy right now?
< http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-jetspeed/proposals/portletAPI/ >
I tried to find one on the IBM sites
< http://www.developer.ibm.com/welcome/websphere/wps/ >
< http://www-4.ibm.com/software/webservers/portal/ >
but came up empty. Many mentions of the API. Just couldn't find the API
itself.
Is the code in the portlet_api branch to be considered a "reference
implementation"?
I also take it the current plan is to move Jetspeed to the new API in
the 1.3a3 timeframe, rather than move onto Jetspeed 2?
-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Custom Software ~ Technical Services.
-- Tel +1 716 737-3463
-- http://www.husted.com/about/struts/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
