Slide architecture is well designed. In my opinion, the best way to work is
to build a specific Slide Security store which is using the Turbine/Jetspeed
security model. By doing this, it is very easy to assign a specific
Turbine/Jetspeed users or groups  to a Slide ObjectNode (content) for a
specific action (read, write, manage, ...). Futhermore, it is not necessary
to change the default implementation of  the Security helper class. Until
now, I didn't map the Slide action to the Jetspeed action but it should be
nice

I'm building a complete jetspeed application which has this kind of
"Turbine/Jetspeed Security Slide Store". I can send you the code if you
want. I add only less then 10 classes and build 2 new jetspeed services. It
is not a big coding.  Now, this security stuff is finish and I'm building
CMS portlets (A simple CMS portlet Viewer & a CMS admin portlet).

Send me a mail if you want the code and the demo. It is a simple extension
of the current Jetspeed code & templates. Via other mail, I can give more
info step by step on this code. I' very interesting to receive some feedback
on it.

Christophe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Weaver, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jetspeed Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:29 PM
Subject: RE: jetspeed security and slide


> > Sure would be nice to get Jetspeed security to sit on top of Slide
> > documents.
> That would be VERY cool!
>
> > Have you given that any thought?
> > (I haven't until just now :)
> I just started looking at Slide today.  I thought it would be easy to plug
in a different security options for Slide, i.e. a
org.apache.slide.common.Security implementation that wraps JetspeedSecurity.
>
> However, after looking at the slide source, it may be more work than I
expected as there is A LOT of hard coding when it comes to Slide's service
implementation.  I can get around it, but it's going to take a little effort
to do that.
>
> Fortunately, Security and all the other important services follow a high-
level interface / low-level service component mode.  This should make things
a little easier.
>
> As for Jetspeed security on top of Slide documents, I'm not to sure as I
have just started down the Slide road today.  However, I do see many
similarities like actions and such between the two security models.  We
would probably need something like a documents.xreg registry to tie security
references to Slide documents and then somehow tie that straight into Slide
itself.
>
> I will keep looking at source and examples at let you know if come up with
any revelations.
>
> p.s.
>
> In regards to the email you sent me.  I found it in an archive but the
attachment was corrupt.  Any ideas on that?
>
> Scott
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Sean Taylor [mailto:david@;bluesunrise.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:55 PM
> > To: Jetspeed Users List
> > Subject: RE: jetspeed security and slide
> >
> > Sure would be nice to get Jetspeed security to sit on top of Slide
> > documents.
> > Have you given that any thought?
> > (I haven't until just now :)
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Weaver, Scott [mailto:Sweaver@;rippe.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:43 AM
> > > To: 'Jetspeed Users List'
> > > Subject: RE: jetspeed security and slide
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks David.
> > >
> > > I didn't think to search the Jetspeed list, doh!  Unfortunately,
> > > I didn't find much of anything on customizing security in the
> > > Slide archives.
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-user-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-user-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:jetspeed-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:jetspeed-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to