Hello Ron: Jetspeed 2.2 uses pluto 2.0 which is the aligned version with JSR 286. So yes, We are expecting a full compatibilty with the new specs.
On Sun Apr 19,2009 07:39 am, Ron McNulty wrote: > Hi David > > Portlet 2.0? Is that full JSR286 compatability? > > Great if it will be... > > Regards > > Ron > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Sean Taylor" > <[email protected]> > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:44 AM > Subject: Re: Release of Jetspeed 2.2 > > >> On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Pierce wrote: >>> What is the release target for Jetspeed 2.2? I found several posts from >>> mid-last year but nothing recent. My project is considering using J2 as >>> the >>> underlying technology for its portal-based user interface (shipping it >>> with >>> every user interface). The release date is 6+ months out. Would we be >>> better off starting with 2.1.3 and moving to 2.2 when it becomes >>> available >>> or is the current state of 2.2 stable enough for us to start our >>> development >>> against it? There is also the possibility that we could contribute >>> back to >>> the project itself if things worked out. >>> >> We have slipped quite a bit on the release of 2.2.0. The process of >> getting Jetspeed and Pluto synchronized, plus all the new features in the >> Portlet 2.0 specification required a lot of refactoring and >> implementation work. The team is working towards releasing by end of >> April now. We have a small set of issues remaining, I believe its >> possible to meet our date. We will also be releasing Pluto 2.0, and the >> initial releases of Portals Applications within the same time period. If >> you are looking for Portlet 2.0 support, and working with all the new >> Jetspeed features coming out this year following 2.2.0, I would >> definitely recommend developing against the 2..2.0 release over the 2.1.x >> branch. We will maintain the 2.1.x branch for bug fixes. I hope to have a >> better roadmap on the site this week. Will send a link to this list when >> its there.. >>> Has anyone else shipped Jetspeed as the major component of their user >>> interface? Or is it primarily used as a development server or intranet? >> yes, absolutely. Speaking just for our company, we are developing >> applications that can run in both our CMS product or Jetspeed equally. We >> are using Wicket and/or a CMS toolkit for our portlet application >> development >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
