Regarding the problem of javascript link ending in .js to .html, with which 
portlet do you meet the problem?
j2-admin::SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet, 
j2-admin::SSOFormBasedAuthReverseProxyIFramePortlet, 
j2-admin::SSOIFramePortlet, j2-admin::SSOWebContentPortlet, or 
j2-admin::SSOProxyPortletPortlet?

j2-admin::SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet and 
j2-admin::SSOFormBasedAuthReverseProxyIFramePortlet only are using the reverse 
proxy service.

If you are using those reverse proxy portlets, then how's the rewriter 
configurations for the reverse proxy pass mapping in 
/j2-admin/WEB-INF/conf/reverseproxy.properties?
I'd like to recommend you to use the default configuration like the apache 
example:

# ... Sets detail attributes for apache path mapping
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.local = /apache/
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.remote = http://apache.org/
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.rewriter.basic = 
org.apache.portals.applications.webcontent.rewriter.WebContentRewriter
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.rewriter.parserAdaptor = html
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.rewriter.parserAdaptor.html = 
org.apache.portals.applications.webcontent.proxy.impl.DefaultReverseProxyLinkRewritingParserAaptor
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.rewriter.parserAdaptor.html.mimeType = text/html
proxy.reverse.pass.apache.rewriter.parserAdaptor.html.property.lookUpAllMappings
 = true

With the default example above, the rewriting xml rule files such as 
default-rewriter-rules.xml and rewriter-rules-mapping do not play any role with 
reverse proxying portlets.

The last example in the configuration file still uses the Neko and Sax parser 
adaptor configuation, which was provided for the old web content portlets. 
However, it turns out to be less useful in this reverse proxy portlets. (The 
old rewriting xml rules were mainly for rewriting urls to portlet urls, while 
reverse proxy service is just another servlet-based solution with integration 
to portlet, meaning the url rewriting doesn't need to be that complex any more.)

One more tip is that you could test the reverse proxying by navigating the 
proxied urls directly.
So, for example, if http://www.yourdomain.com/orders/ is mapped to 
/j2-admin/rproxy/yourdomain/orders/, then you can browse directly to 
http://localhost:8080/j2-admin/rproxy/yourdomain/orders/. You can see what 
happens for rewriting problems with this direct access.

HTH,

Woonsan

--- On Fri, 8/20/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, August 20, 2010, 6:55 PM
> Good to know.  So I have rebuilt
> my site on 2.2.1 and it seems to be 
> stable, unlike the previous implementation on Derby. 
> Not sure if that's 
> an indication of a problem with 2.2.1 & Derby, or just
> a local issue.  My 
> remaining issue is the rewrite in the reverse proxy portlet
> is changing a 
> javascript link ending in .js to .html  Any ideas?
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> Woonsan Ko <[email protected]>
> To:
> Jetspeed Users List <[email protected]>
> Date:
> 08/20/2010 11:50 AM
> Subject:
> Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> 
> 
> 
> I believe the pages can be simply copied because I cannot
> find anything to 
> watch with psml pages either.
> By the way, you can copy those pages into any other folder
> by configuring 
> the path in /jetspeed/WEB-INF/conf/override.properties. For
> example,
> 
> # default path to (XML) PSML pages root folder
> psml.pages.path =
> ${applicationRoot}/WEB-INF/migrated_pages
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Woonsan
> 
> --- On Fri, 8/20/10, [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > From: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> > To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Friday, August 20, 2010, 3:05 PM
> > I have installed 2.2.1 with MySQL and
> > I now need to move my pages and 
> > layouts from the 2.2.0 installation.  Given that
> my
> > previous 2.2.1 
> > installation on Derby is defunct, is there anything I
> > should watch out for 
> > this time?  Can I simply copy the psml's from
> the
> > 2.2.0 directories to the 
> > 2.2.1 directories?   I have not seen a
> > migration guide to address this 
> > need.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From:
> > Woonsan Ko <[email protected]>
> > To:
> > Jetspeed Users List <[email protected]>
> > Date:
> > 08/18/2010 12:35 PM
> > Subject:
> > Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I haven't heard of that preferences data problem yet
> in
> > 2.2.1.
> > IMHO, It could help to localize the problems if you
> test
> > against other 
> > databases 
> > like PostgreSQL or MySQL.
> > On the other hand, I think you could deploy newer
> > j2-admin.war and 
> > apa-webcontent.war which were included in 2.2.1.
> > 
> > -Woonsan
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: "[email protected]"
> > <[email protected]>
> > > To: Jetspeed Users List <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 6:10:25 AM
> > > Subject: Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> > > 
> > > Well, here's the rub.  I believe the
> > SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet is new 
> > 
> > > in 2.2.1, which is where I was when I first
> posted,
> > however, I found 
> > that 
> > > my configuration kept getting scrambled, so I
> reverted
> > to 2.2.0  I will 
> > > try your suggestion on 2.2.1, but I will have to
> > address the scrambling 
> > > issue.  What is happening is this.  I
> have
> > cloned the  IFramePortlet 
> > > several times and configured each for different
> static
> > content  being 
> > > served from apache2.  I have avoided setting
> any
> > user  preferences, and, 
> > 
> > > instead, set the preferences for each clone in
> the
> > PAM  portlet. 
> > Everything 
> > > worked fine.  Then after a few hours, the 
> > IFramePortlet content was all 
> > 
> > > mixed up.  For instance, the portlet on 
> > page 1 would be showing the 
> > > content I had configured for the portlet on page
> 
> > 2 and so on.  I went 
> > into 
> > > PAM and corrected the preferences to what 
> they
> > should be and assumed I 
> > was 
> > > ok, but the next morning things were 
> scrambled
> > again.  I did some 
> > queries 
> > > in the derby db and it appears  they are
> wrong
> > there.  I don't know if 
> > this 
> > > is a portlet id issue or an  indexing
> problem or
> > what, but I need a 
> > > resolution before I can proceed to  2.2.1 
> > Of course, I have the exact 
> > same 
> > > configuration in 2.2.0 and am  having no
> problem
> > there, but I also have 
> > no 
> > > SSOReverseProxyIFrame  there.  Any
> ideas?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > From:
> > > David Sean Taylor <[email protected]>
> > > To:
> > > Jetspeed  Users List <[email protected]>
> > > Date:
> > > 08/17/2010  07:19 PM
> > > Subject:
> > > Re: SSO IFrame form authentication
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:40 PM, 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> > wrote:
> > > > How did your testing go?  I compared
> SSO
> > Webcontent (which  works, 
> > sort 
> > > of)
> > > > to SSO IFrame classes and I see a method
> > for  preemptive login in the
> > > > webcontent class but no reference at all in
> > the  SSO IFrame class. 
> > Does
> > > > this just mean it is being done 
> > differently, or is something amiss in 
> > 
> > > the
> > > > SSO IFrame  class?
> > > 
> > > There are two SSOIFrame classes:
> > > 
> > > 1. SSOIFramePortlet
> > > 2.  SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet
> > > 
> > > Suggest using the second one, 
> > SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet as it gives
> > > you features not available in the  older
> > SSOIFramePortlet such as
> > > auto-resizing and form-based authentication 
> > (what you are after)
> > > 
> > > I tested with SSOReverseProxyIFramePortlet and
> > it  worked in the
> > > example that comes with Jetspeed, but it takes a
> > little bit  of
> > > configuration.
> > > 
> > > First, ensure your Tomcat will need this
> > attribute  set in the
> > > <Connector> element of  server.xml:
> > > 
> > > emptySessionPath="true"
> > > 
> > > more detail  here:
> > > 
> > > http://portals.apache.org/applications/webcontent/index.html
> > > 
> > > If  you had to change server.xml setting,
> then
> > restart your server
> > > 
> > > I took  these steps to verify SSO with the
> > example form-based login
> > > that comes with  Jetspeed:
> > > 
> > > 1. login as admin
> > > 2. navigate to the Jetspeed Administration 
> > space, SSO Management page,
> > > or just go  here:
> > > 
> > > http://localhost:8080/jetspeed/ui/Administrative/sso-admin.psml
> > > 
> > > Add  a new Site with following parameters:
> > > 
> > > Site Name: Form Example
> > > Site  URL: http://localhost:8080/j2-admin/examples/formauth.jsp
> > > Field name for User  ID: user
> > > Field name For Password value: pass
> > > 
> > > Press Save
> > > 
> > > Add a  new credential for this site in the
> > portlet on the right side
> > > (SSO  Details):
> > > 
> > > Portal Principal:   admin
> > > Remote Principal:   admin
> > > Remote Credential: admin
> > > 
> > > Press Add
> > > 
> > > You  can verify  that the remote
> credential
> > was added for the admin
> > > user by going  here:
> > > 
> > > http://localhost:8080/jetspeed/ui/my-account.psml
> > > 
> > > see the  portlet on the right "SSO Change
> > Passwords", a remote site
> > > entry should be  there named "Form Example"
> > > 
> > > Next, you can use the Toolbox to find the 
> > Reverse Proxy Iframe Portlet
> > > by searching on "iframe" and then selecting it 
> > from there and adding
> > > to a page. To make things simple, I just added a
> > page  and then added
> > > the Reverse Proxy Iframe Portlet there. At first
> this
> > portlet  seems to
> > > want to use Basic Authentication, so just hit
> cancel
> > when  challenged.
> > > I then switched to edit mode (pencil icon), and
> > entered the  following
> > > preferences:
> > > 
> > > TITLE: My SSO Test
> > > SRC:  http://localhost:$
> {serverPort}${contextPath}/examples/formauth.jsp
> > > 
> > > Press  Save
> > > 
> > > You should see in your portlet content something
> 
> > like:
> > > 
> > > "Hello, admin. You have been authorized by
> > form-based  authentication 
> > !!!"
> > > 
> > > Give that a try and see if it works. Then, move
> on
> > to  your specific
> > > IFrame source and let us know how it 
> goes...
> > > 
> > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To  unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For  additional commands, e-mail: 
> [email protected]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > This  message has been scanned for viruses
> and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner,  and is
> > > believed to be clean 
> > (mailgw2:E659D1E6FC.D1395).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This communication and any  attachments are
> > confidential, protected by 
> > > Communications Privacy Act 18  USCS §
> 2510,
> > solely for the use of the 
> > > intended recipient, and may contain 
> legally
> > privileged material. If you 
> > 
> > > are not the intended recipient, please 
> return or
> > destroy it 
> > immediately. 
> > > Thank you.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean (mailgw2:9902C1E701.B0EA8).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This communication and any attachments are
> confidential,
> > protected by 
> > Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS § 2510, solely for
> the
> > use of the 
> > intended recipient, and may contain legally
> privileged
> > material. If you 
> > are not the intended recipient, please return or
> destroy it
> > immediately. 
> > Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean (mailgw2:8B04D2A000C.7088C).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This communication and any attachments are confidential,
> protected by 
> Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS § 2510, solely for the
> use of the 
> intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged
> material. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it
> immediately. 
> Thank you.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to