just following up on an old thread.

Would it be possible to at least mark all jetty threads as daemon threads?


A simple test like this is stuck forever. Because all the jetty threads are
non daemon threads

@ClientEndpoint

*public* *class* Test {

    *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception {

        WebSocketContainer ws = ContainerProvider.*getWebSocketContainer*();

        ws.connectToServer(*new* Test(), *new* URI("ws://wuhu.wuhu"));

    }

}


Cheers
  Kasper






On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote:

> The JSR-356 websocket containers do not have a lifecycle.
> It is expected that you request only 1 WebSocketContainer and use it for
> the life of your JVM.
>
> Avoid using ContainerProvider.getWebSocketContainer() multiple times.
>
> Note, if all you are wanting is a container suitable for instantiating
> outgoing connections from a web application, then you can access the
> ServerContainer from
> ServerContainer container = (ServerContainer)
> HttpServletRequest.getAttribute("javax.websocket.server.ServerContainer");
>
> There is only ever 1 of those (per web application)
> From there you can use the container.connectToServer() calls like before.
>
>
> --
> Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]>
> webtide.com <http://www.webtide.com/> - intalio.com/jetty
> Expert advice, services and support from from the Jetty & CometD experts
> eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kasper Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to port an existing Jetty 9.0 websocket implementation to
>> javax.websocket.
>>
>> I'm creating a WebSocketContainer using
>>   WebSocketContainer container = ContainerProvider.
>> *getWebSocketContainer*();
>> which will pick up an instance of ClientContainer/ServerContainer.
>>
>> What is the preferred way to shut down the container again seeing that
>> WebSocketContainer does not have lifecycle methods?
>>
>> ((org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle) container).stop();
>> works but depends on the Jetty implementation.
>>
>> Cheers
>>   Kasper
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to