All,

Milestone 2 release of Jetty 9.3.0 should now be available from maven
central.
We hope this will be our last development milestone release before we make
a release candidate and move to a 9.3.0 stable release.

The headline feature in 9.3.0 is HTTP/2 support, but there is also a lot of
other goodness that is there that is worthwhile trying out.

We have implemented a entirely new threading execution strategy at the IO
selector and HTTP/2 multiplexing layer.    These changes are designed to
improve both latency and throughput of request handling by better utilising
the active thread to complete discovered/generated/parsed tasks.  This
reduces latency by avoiding dispatch delays and improves throughput by
using the CPU core that has a hot cache to complete a task.    Our early
testing on cometd indicates that it is delivering the promised improvements.

There has also been a lot of stability work done on the semantics of
servlet async IO.  A few ambiguous parts of the specification have been
clarified with the servlet EG and we have created more unit tests of edge
cases and nasty races.    If you are using servlet async IO then moving to
9.3 will give you a better defined and executed semantic.

Jetty-9.3 now uses the apache JSP implementation, so we are bug for bug
compatible with other containers:)

We are also working on jetty CDI integration and the next release will have
CDI available for webapps, servlets, filters and websockets.

It would be great if you could try out the 9.3.0.M2 release and give us any
feedback before we move to release candidates.

regards




-- 
Greg Wilkins <[email protected]>  @  Webtide - *an Intalio subsidiary*
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to