I tried changing ducc: to DUCC like this:

[[Host=192.168.6.67:42133], [User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0],
[Accept=text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8],
[Accept-Language=en-US,en;q=0.5], [Accept-Encoding=gzip, deflate],
[Cookie=JSESSIONID=16cf2jfvlj24hv0pxjnd3phor; DUCCrefreshmode=automatic;
DUCCjobsmax=16; DUCCjobsusers=; DUCCagents=hide], [Connection=keep-alive]]

and there seems to be no improvement.

In CookieCutter.getCookies() I see the value for _cookies =
org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException: Source lookup error

Lou.



On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote:

> You have badly defined cookies.
>
> Starting here ...
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-4.2
>
> The request "Cookie" header is defined to have the values ..
>
>    cookie-header = "Cookie:" OWS cookie-string OWS
>    cookie-string = cookie-pair *( ";" SP cookie-pair )
>
>
> Next we look at
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-4.1.1
>
> which defines cookie-pair as
>
>  cookie-pair       = cookie-name "=" cookie-value
>  cookie-name       = token
>  cookie-value      = *cookie-octet / ( DQUOTE *cookie-octet DQUOTE )
>  cookie-octet      = %x21 / %x23-2B / %x2D-3A / %x3C-5B / %x5D-7E
>                        ; US-ASCII characters excluding CTLs,
>                        ; whitespace DQUOTE, comma, semicolon,
>                        ; and backslash
>  token             = <token, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-2.2>>
>
>
> Now we take a look at
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-2.2
>
> which defines token as
>
>        token          = 1*<any CHAR except CTLs or separators>
>        separators     = "(" | ")" | "<" | ">" | "@"
>                       | "," | ";" | ":" | "\" | <">
>                       | "/" | "[" | "]" | "?" | "="
>                       | "{" | "}" | SP | HT
>
>
> Which tells us that the cookie-name you are using with the ":" symbol is
> not allowed per spec.
> The cookie-names "ducc:refreshmode", "ducc:agents", "ducc:jobsmax",
> "ducc:jobsusers" are all invalid.
>
>
> Joakim Erdfelt / [email protected]
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Lou DeGenaro <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> When I put a breakpoint @ line 254 in
>> org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.getResuestFields() the
>> _fileds value is:
>>
>> [[Host=192.168.6.67:42133], [User-Agent=Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
>> rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0],
>> [Accept=text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8],
>> [Accept-Language=en-US,en;q=0.5], [Accept-Encoding=gzip, deflate], [Referer=
>> http://192.168.6.67:42133/jobs.jsp], [Cookie=ducc:refreshmode=automatic;
>> ducc:agents=show; JSESSIONID=yimag13sezeb18azc3oaoppe3; ducc:jobsmax=16;
>> ducc:jobsusers=], [Connection=keep-alive]]
>>
>> Is there something wrong with the Cookie format which previously worked
>> in Jetty 7 but does not seem to work in Jetty 8?
>>
>> Lou.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Lou DeGenaro <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We are attempting to upgrade from 7.4.4 to 8.1.16 and find that although
>>> the browser shows cookies, on the server side HttpServletRequest
>>> getCookies() does not find them.  What's changed?
>>>
>>> Lou.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jetty-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to