Kiir: Please, Overhaul the Old system

BY Michael Thon Mangok, SOUTH SUDAN

AUG. 5/2011, SSN; As the dust settles over the euphoric scenes that
greeted the dawn of a new era in South Sudan, the political banter
occupying the corridors of power is who will make the list of Salva
Kiir’s new cabinet?

Anxiety has gripped the political elite and the common man as
speculation and intense lobbying reaches pitch fever about the first
post independence cabinet.

Will Kiir crack the whip on his incompetent and corrupt cronies and
replace them with technocrats who will deliver the economy of South
Sudan from a tailspin?

When the President releases his cabinet list there will be both joy
and mourning--- those that will be appointed and those dropped.

Tribal warlords whose anointed leaders will be appointed to the
positions they had lobbied for alongside their kinsmen, will slaughter
bulls to celebrate the appointment.

Those that will not be appointed will now invoke tribal sentiments and
attempt to stir their kinsmen to renege because they have not been
appointed. Kiir cannot be held at ransom and as a Head of State who
has a Herculean task to rehabilitate a moribund economy as citizens do
not expect him to dispense patronage.

When the United States of America first black President Barrack Obama
visited Ghana in 2007 he made a rousing speech where he said “Africa
does not need strong men but strong institutions”.

Will the fledgling democracy of South Sudan pick the establishment of
strong institutions in place of patronage?  There is need to focus on
building independent institutions rather than placating the wishes of
tribal warlords.

The South also seems to be hostage of the Khartoum regime mentality
and there are fears emerging that it may not be any different from its
oppressors in the north.

A distinguished Ugandan professor of Anthropology at Columbia
University, and the head of Makerere Institute for Social Research
Mahmood Mamdani during a public lecture in 2010 argued that, “The
South will  separate from the north but the question is will the new
government in the south establish the new political order or will they
produce the old one?”

He was discussing a paper titled ‘the significance of south Sudan referendum.’

To respond to Mamdani’s question, I think the South faces a daunting
task of replacing a new political order over the old one.

There are clear signs that we will likely operate with the old system
because most of our institutions such as the police, the ministry of
labor, public service and judiciary are just an extension of the old
order---not professional, premised on nepotism and crippled with
graft.

Although South Sudan had its own interim constitution which gave
leeway to lawmakers to formulate policies and laws that could
distinguish the South from her counterpart the North little was done
and today the statute books read like the carbon copy of Khartoum’s
laws.

Already many ministries are in limbo. The Ministry of Labor and Public
service has failed to streamline and manage the small numbers of Goss
employees, which only requires a basic computer data base program to
manage.

Does it even require a Computer Science graduate? It’s very unlikely.
The ministry resorted to the outdated system of filing documents and
yet with the new technological age a simple computer program could
archive these files for posterity.  Why can’t we get the basics right
if we are to move this country forward?

The ministry has become a termite food centre where they can no longer
go hungry but comfortably feed on the old files that have been dumped
for years in the store.

A university graduate earns salary that cannot sustain him/her for 15
days without considering the cost of living in Juba, which is the
highest in the East African region.

 On the other hand, Police is just a duplication of Khartoum. Often
brutal and with disregard to civil liberties, the police here
sometimes appears like an appendage of Khartoum’s repressive arm. Is
this what we need after Independence?

According to the Constitution, English is the official language in the
south but once again police is stick stuck in the old system.

Apart from the fact that all police files are still in Arabic system,
the few officers who are trained in English, for instance in the CID
and Public security department have always been threatened that if
they cannot learn Arabic then nobody would consider their reports.
This shows how the nation is still being held at ransom. We should
break the chains of Arabic bondage and move on as a new nation.

And yet there are still many glaring weaknesses. For example its I
find it innocuous that the Bank of southern Sudan has not employed any
graduate who went to school in East Africa or elsewhere in the
diaspora.

For those of us who went to school in neighboring Uganda, Kenya and
the greater Diaspora, are we not South Sudanese? A state should grant
equal opportunity to its citizens and any kind of favoritism is a
recipe for disaster.

It was such a comical activity when documents for those who would be
employed in the bank were taken to Khartoum for verification and only
those who finished their studies in Sudan universities were endorsed.
Those who studied outside were rejected.

The Governor has conspicuously remained silent and yet the South
boosts of great scholars who scaled the lofty heights at universities
like Harvard, Oxford and Yale. Why do we deny our very own sons and
daughters employment and encourage brain drain yet we need them now?

I know I will continuously rattle some feathers but I must speak the truth.

Finally the ministry of Foreign affairs is also riddled with error;
our foreign policy framework was drawn by those who have worked for
the Sudan foreign ministry. They are likely to design Sudan’s foreign
policy for the south. As the lobbying intensifies those who were the
ambassadors in Khartoum regime could likely out-compete their
counterpart in the SPLA/M considering their competence. But Kiir
should also consider a few new faces for Foreign Service.

We shed blood to change the old Sudan system of governance into a
progressively meaningful system that is against discrimination of any
citizen, gives protection to their fundamental human rights regardless
of their race, religion and tribe.

If the government which has been in the bush for more than 22 years
and in town for less than six years would ask its citizens to produce
the academic qualifications alongside 10 years of experience, it does
not only sound empty rhetoric but ridiculous.

Mr. President, did SPLA/SPLM gain work experience at the treacherous
battle front?

  Michael Thon Mangok is a journalist and social critic; [email protected]

COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the
author(s) and do not represent those of the website.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to