On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:22:42AM +1000, Darren Gibbs wrote: > Yes, that's the bit I'm referring to - the "total" field in the performance > graph. > > I noticed it was new in 0.7.8, and _really_ like it - it's very useful for > me, and > once it's consistantly right will allow me to eliminate a couple of other > SNMP > data gatherers which count bytes on links for me - but it does appear to > make some > errors occasionally.
I've have had some experience in billing systems and RRD files. There is too much rounding going on in RRD for it to be accurate for billing. Of course for capacity planning you could use it. Billing should be 1-5% error, capacity planning can have 10% or more. It sounds however that you have found some specific error, or are you comparing it to some other collector? - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
