Hello everybody,

I have had a new poller item like that :
ID       Description     Name (Match RRD Struct DS)      Poller Command (file)
Parameters
10001   Mail Accounting Total   mail_delete     snmp_counter
        .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.51.101.1

The OID is a private one and exec un shell script via snmpd.conf :
exec .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.51 mail /usr/local/bin/stat_mail.sh

This OID works good and return a value : #snmpwalk -v 1 localhost public
.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.51.101.1 :
enterprises.ucdavis.51.101.1 = "1171"

Next add this poller to "Linux/Unix System Info" Interface Types :
ID       Description     Internal Name           Position        Interface Type        
  Field
Type     Show            Overwritable            Tracked         Default Value
 10007           Mails Total     mail_total      130     Linux/Unix System Info        
  RRDTool
DS  Never                                Type: Gauge Min: 0 Max: 10000 or Use  for Max

Next add an entry in "Poller/Backend Grouping" in Linux/Unix Host:
 10006           Linux/Unix Host         75      Mail Accounting Total           
Temporal Buffer

And a graphe type :
 10001           Mails           Linux/Unix System Info                  mail_stats    
  500     175            
0        0

And a new php script : mail_stats.inc.php with a copy of the rtt graph, change
the value rtt by mail_stats.

When I run php -q poller.php 4 41, the rrd file is created, I can see a graph,
but after new polling, the rrd is not change, and no value in it (rrdtool dump
interface-41-12.rrd)
THe result of the poller :
bash-2.05$ php -q poller.php 4 41
 :  H   4 : Poller Start : 14 Items.
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  10 : snmp_counter:cpu_nice_ticks(.1.3..1.0): 1305 ->
buffer(): 1 (time P:3.19 | 0.34)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  15 : snmp_counter:num_procs(.1.3..6.0): 261 ->
buffer(): 2 (time P:1.4 | 0.12)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  20 : snmp_counter:cpu_user_ticks(.1.3..0.0): 43094 ->
buffer(): 3 (time P:1.12 | 0.12)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  25 : snmp_counter:num_users(.1.3..5.0): 0 -> buffer():
4 (time P:0.92 | 0.11)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  30 : snmp_counter:cpu_idle_ticks(.1.3..3.0): 6540643 ->
buffer(): 5 (time P:1.08 | 0.11)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  35 : snmp_counter:tcp_established(.1.3..9.0): 68 ->
buffer(): 6 (time P:0.84 | 0.11)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  40 : snmp_counter:cpu_system_ticks(.1.3..2.0): 79668 ->
buffer(): 7 (time P:1.08 | 0.11)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  45 : snmp_counter:tcp_active(.1.3..5.0): 46088 ->
buffer(): 8 (time P:0.71 | 0.11)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  50 : snmp_counter:load_average_1(.1.3..3.1): 0.06 ->
buffer(): 9 (time P:0.84 | 0.13)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  55 : snmp_counter:tcp_passive(.1.3..6.0): 0 ->
buffer(): 10 (time P:71.5 | 0.19)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  60 : snmp_counter:load_average_5(.1.3..3.2): 0.13 ->
buffer(): 11 (time P:2.81 | 0.19)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  70 : snmp_counter:load_average_15(.1.3..3.3): 0.10 ->
buffer(): 12 (time P:0.97 | 0.18)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  75 : snmp_counter:mail_total(.1.3..1.1): "1179" ->
buffer(): 13 (time P:173.07 | 0.15)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P  80 : no_poller(): 0 -> rrd(*): cpu_user_ticks:43094 -
cpu_idle_ticks:6540643 - cpu_nice_ticks:1305 - cpu_system_ticks:79668 -
load_average_1:0.06 - load_average_5:0.13 - load_average_15:0.10 - num_users:0
- num_procs:261 - tcp_active:46088 - tcp_passive:0 - tcp_established:68 (time
P:0.19 | 117.95)
 :  H   4 :  I  41 :  P LPD : last_poll_date(): 1094153380 ->
db(last_poll_date): 1 (time P:0.21 | 2.29)
 :  H   4 : Poller End, Total Time: 392.6 msec.

The problem is at the no_poller() line, no value for mail_total, but I don't see
what's wrong in my new poller definition.

Thanks for your help.
Pierre




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=click
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users

Reply via email to