Hi Cody,
The current way to calculate the 95th percentile is on-the-fly so every time you request a graph with it enabled, it will fetch the data and run the computations.
And yes, its "time-consuming".
I also think your setup is not enough, how many hosts do you have?
The only suggestion I can make you is to upgrade the box or get some fast SCSI disks so the data reading part is fast.
Javier
Cody Holland wrote:
After adding 95th percentile to one of our routers, the cpu load of my
server went through the roof. The cpu was previously averaging around
35% - 45% utilization. Now it's pretty much maxed out all the time. Is there something that I've done wrong? If not, is there anyway to
reduce the cpu cost? I'm running a dual p3 500 with 512mb ecc ram. We're currently monitoring 396 interfaces, and need to add more. I've
also enabled the use of poller2. Any ideas or suggestions would be
great.
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Javier Szyszlican, Project Leader, JFFNMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope JFFNMS or I were helpful to you, if you can, please donate at http://jffnms.org/donate
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
