On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:44:42AM -0500, Doug Veldhuisen wrote: > # Old/Current Poller > */5 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q poller.php >/dev/null 2>&1 > > >>>> if I use the poller2 entry list later, should this one be commented > out? You either need this one or poller 2 running. Do not run none, do not run both; just one of them. This poller forks out multiple children after waiting a certain amount of time, while the other pre-forks out a specified number of children and just feeds them jobs when they are done.
For small instalations, it doesn't matter. For large poller2 is better but it is best to try both as some people are getting better performance from the old poller. > # Interface Autodiscovery > */30 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q autodiscovery_interfaces.php > > /dev/null 2 > >&1 > > >>>> There is another interface autodiscovery list below, uncommented, > what is the difference > >>>> between this on and the interface autodiscovery listed in the > experimental stuff section? > >>>> use together as showen or is this an error, such as use one or the > other, but not both. Basically my comments for the poller are the same for this one too. The main difference being that it doesn't matter nearly as much which one you use. > #*/1 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q poller2.php master > $THREADS >/dev/null 2> > &1 > >>> IF using this one, uncomment this and comment out poller entry above? Yes. > */30 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q autodiscovery_interfaces.php master > $THREA > DS > /dev/null 2>&1 > >>> There is an interface autodiscovery listed about, use both or only one? only one > # Network Autodiscovery > #*/30 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q autodiscovery_network.php master > $THREADS > > /dev/null 2>&1 > >>> Would using this help anything or is it to expiremental yet? It tries to discover hosts on your network. I personally do not use that, but any host that we want to monitor goes through an activation process. > #*/1 * * * * cd $JFFNMS && $PHP -q poller_helper.php >/dev/null 2>&1 > >>> Would this help polling? or as the comment says, NOT use? dont use > Was going thru my implementation of JFFNMS and noticed this. My > performance is not good right now, probably running it on the wrong > machine, but this is the only thing I have--so I was checking everything I > could think of to squeeze every drop of performance I could. You don't say what platform you are running it on, or how many interfaces and hosts you have. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
