Hi Craig, 

If I run manually the php poller.php I get this output : 
jffnms:/usr/share/jffnms/engine# php poller.php 54 987
11:42:08  :  H  54 : Poller Start : 19 Items.
11:42:08  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  10 : verify_interface_number(): 1 ->
verify_interface_number(): interfacenumber not changed (time P:6.7 |
2.07)
11:42:08  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  15 :
cisco_snmp_ping_start:cisco_snmp_ping_start(): -1 -> buffer(): 1 (time
P:1.6 | 0.4)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  16 : interface_oper_status(8): up ->
alarm(3,,180): Nothing was done (time P:2.83 | 1.57)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  17 : interface_admin_status(7): up ->
db(show_rootmap,down=2|up=1,0): 0 (time P:2.57 | 0.51)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  20 : snmp_counter:input(.1.3..6.1):
2226611600 -> buffer(): 2 (time P:2.05 | 0.32)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  25 :
snmp_counter:inpackets(.1.3..7.1): 2100094051 -> buffer(): 3 (time P:1.5
| 0.23)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  30 : snmp_counter:output(.1.3..0.1):
951821625 -> buffer(): 4 (time P:2.04 | 0.23)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  35 :
snmp_counter:outpackets(.1.3..1.1): 1010621414 -> buffer(): 5 (time
P:1.7 | 0.23)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  40 :
snmp_counter:outputerrors(.1.3..0.1): 0 -> buffer(): 6 (time P:1.66 |
0.25)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  45 :
snmp_counter:inputerrors(.1.3..4.1): 0 -> buffer(): 7 (time P:1.42 |
0.3)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  46 : snmp_counter:drops(.1.3..9.1): 0
-> buffer(): 8 (time P:1.87 | 0.35)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  47 : db:bandwidthin(band..tes):
3000000 -> buffer(): 9 (time P:0.63 | 0.2)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  48 : db:bandwidthout(band..tes):
3000000 -> buffer(): 10 (time P:0.21 | 0.19)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  50 : cisco_snmp_ping_wait(): -1 ->
no_backend(): 0 (time P:0.68 | 0.28)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  55 :
cisco_snmp_ping_get_pl:packetloss(): 0 -> buffer(): 11 (time P:0.41 |
0.18)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  60 : cisco_snmp_ping_get_rtt:rtt(): 0
-> buffer(): 12 (time P:1.13 | 0.43)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  65 : cisco_snmp_ping_end(): -1 ->
no_backend(): 0 (time P:0.38 | 0.12)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P  80 : no_poller(): 0 -> rrd(*):
input:2226611600 - output:951821625 - inputerrors:0 - outputerrors:0 -
rtt:0 - packetloss:0 - inpackets:2100094051 - outpackets:1010621414 -
drops:0 - bandwidthin:3000000 - bandwidthout:3000000 (time P:0.54 |
472.13)
11:42:09  :  H  54 :  I 987 :  P LPD : last_poll_date(): 1160473329 ->
db(last_poll_date): 1 (time P:0.52 | 5.43)
11:42:09  :  H  54 : Poller End, Total Time: 567.37 msec.

So for as far I understand it, the bandwithin and bandwithout parameters
do exist.

Can you help me further with this ? 

Greetz, 

Sebastian


 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Craig Small
Verzonden: woensdag 4 oktober 2006 13:59
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: [jffnms-users] question about custom SLA

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Dijk, Sebastian van wrote:
> Then i created a condition group : 
>  
> ID Description  Interface Type  Event Type Alarm State Event Text 
> Threshold % (for Reports)
> 10003 Sebas Cisco Firewall Physical Interfaces SLA  alert  Cisco 
> Firewall 100
>  
> and i added the 2 definitions :
> ID Description  Show Info Condition    Show Expression  Show Unit
You need to add the definitions to the SLA group, this is the titles of
SLA conditions. The SLAs - SLA condition table looks like:
 ID       SLA             Position                Condition   Show      

> I've added the SLA to the host configuration : 
You mean the interface configuration. You have SLAs on interfaces not
hosts.

> But now when my bandwith exceeds the 50 % utilization i get no alert
Run it manually, to see what is going on.
See http://www.jffnms.org/docs/errors.html#id1 for details on how to run
the rrd_analyser manually.

> What am i doing wrong ?
At a guess you didn't match the RRDTool Interface types correctly, or
bandwidth is not defined.

> And where can i find the usable parameters to be used in the 
> expression
Hmm, its not well defined. At a first start use any of the RRDTool
variables for that interface type.

 - Craig

-- 
Craig Small      GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA
DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/   MIEE         Debian
developer
csmall at : enc.com.au                      ieee.org
debian.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE
V
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users

Reply via email to