On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:20:56AM +0200, Eladio Pérez Nieto wrote: > I have a question about scalability. Has any of you worked with > satellites? I have an issue about it. Basically, who needs to be the > more capable computer, the satellite or the main one? I have to use two > very different machines and I'm not sure which use for each task.
I believe that satellite functionality is only partly done or probably won't work the way you think they should. I believe we do need to look into having some sort of scalability feature and yes, it would be something to look into newer releases. But first, it will take some thinking time to get the architecture right. I know some of you have very large installations and probably can tell us what is melting and therefore in need of distribution. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
