On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 16:13 -0500, Pedro Sotelo wrote: > I just upgraded a Storage Drive I was monitoring for Usage from 2.5TB > to 9.5TB. I removed the interface and and recreated but now I am > getting the following error: > The RRDTool files for Interface ID 826 (from Host ID 63), has not been > created by the Poller Process yet > > When I manually run the poller, I get the following and it just hangs: > [r...@nms engine]# php poller.php 63 826 0 0 > Content-type: text/html > X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.9 > 16:02:53 : H 63 : Poller Start : 6 Items. > 16:02:56 : H 63 : I 826 : P 5 : storage_verify(): 3 -> > verify_interface_number(): index not changed (time P:2766.72 | 1.9) > 16:02:56 : H 63 : I 826 : P 10 : > snmp_counter:storage_block_size(.1.3..4.3): 4096 -> buffer(): 1 (time > P:18.61 | 0.41) > 16:02:56 : H 63 : I 826 : P 20 : > snmp_counter:storage_block_count(.1.3..5.3): -1853730336 -> buffer(): > 2 (time P:6.94 | 0.21) > 16:02:56 : H 63 : I 826 : P 30 : > snmp_counter:storage_used_blocks(.1.3..6.3): 556831251 -> buffer(): 3 > (time P:5.53 | 0.21) > > Typically it would go to the next item and the poller would end with > the total time as below: > 16:05:55 : H 63 : I 826 : P 60 : no_poller(): 0 -> rrd(*): > (time P:0.27 | 52.33) > 16:05:55 : H 63 : I 826 : P LPD : last_poll_date(): 1248210355 -> > db(last_poll_date): 1 (time P:0.34 | 46.14) > 16:05:55 : H 63 : Poller End, Total Time: 154.96 msec. > > When I manually poll the next steps, it hangs: > [r...@nms engine]# php poller.php 63 826 0 60 > Content-type: text/html > X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.9 > 16:09:41 : H 63 : Poller Start : 2 Items. > > Does this have to do with the following line having a negative value > of -1853730336 ? > 16:02:56 : H 63 : I 826 : P 20 : > snmp_counter:storage_block_count(.1.3..5.3): -1853730336 -> buffer(): > 2 (time P:6.94 | 0.21) > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Pedro > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > jffnms-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
You are most likely correct that it has to do with that line. It appears as though the larger drive exceeds the maximum value of the counter in the SNMP implementation on the box you are trying to monitor. Unfortunately, the only fix I can think of would be to either use a smaller disk, or find an implementation of SNMP that supports larger counters. It might be possible to modify JFFNMS to read negative numbers as much larger positive numbers, but actually doing so is beyond my knowledge of the system. LMP - Laurence M. Perkins Information Services Stevens County Washington (509) 684-7505 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
