Dave Kleikamp schrieb: >>After that, 'fsck.jfs -v' delivered the following for all (important) >>partitions: >>fsck.jfs version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004
@Dave: would it be worth anything to try a current (1.1.8) version of jfsutils here and in similiar cases? i've read the changelog but i fail to see i attempts were made to make jfs_fsck better at "guessing" how the filesystem should actually look like and fix errors like this. i did not have any serious jfs errors for the last months now, but "CANNOT CONTINUE" messages from fsck.* programs are not good, methinks. thank you for your time, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #354: Chewing gum on /dev/sd3c ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
