I'm very sorry to self-bump, but can I ask some suggestions?

I already changed /tmp to tmpfs so that building large packages won't
hit the problem, but the session directory can't be treated that
way...

Thanks in advance,
// a.

> I recently changed all the ext2 partitions on crappy old linux box to
> shining jfs. Running Debian with homebuilt jfsutils 1.1.14 on Linux
> 2.6.31. Overall I'm satisfied with its behaviour, except that one
> thing. The problem is the session backup directory of a certain daemon
> where all the files in it are updated periodically, or to be precise,
> create-new + delete-old + rename. As a result, that directory got
> bloated to over 10MB in just one week of uptime. I'm surprised and
> searched over web, and realized that it is indeed an expected
> behaviour of current jfs implementation. That directory is meant to be
> a failsafe for crashes so that it must reside on real filesystem, i.e.
> it's pointless to move it to tmpfs.
>
> The question is, is there any plan to fix it, that I can count on? I
> see some posts dated several years ago mentioning that particular
> problem, and it says there were no progress for another years... Just
> some workaround or even dirty gross hack with certain drawbacks will
> help much. Well, I know removing all the nodes and then repopulating
> back does get rid of bloated index, but I think it's not very safe to
> do that while the daemon keep running... and no, shutting down the
> daemon is a bit painful. Also I believe that it's impossible to do it
> safely on the root directory anyway.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to