Calling 'list_splice' followed by 'INIT_LIST_HEAD' is equivalent to 'list_splice_init'.
This has been spotted with the following coccinelle script: ///// @@ expression y,z; @@ - list_splice(y,z); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(y); + list_splice_init(y,z); Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> --- fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c index 2e58978d6f45..4d973524c887 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c @@ -2893,8 +2893,7 @@ restart: * on anon_list2. Let's check. */ if (!list_empty(&TxAnchor.anon_list2)) { - list_splice(&TxAnchor.anon_list2, &TxAnchor.anon_list); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&TxAnchor.anon_list2); + list_splice_init(&TxAnchor.anon_list2, &TxAnchor.anon_list); goto restart; } TXN_UNLOCK(); -- 2.7.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list Jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion