On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:30:57AM -0400, Paul Blazejowski wrote:
> Minor problem here...with compilation of latest stable 2.4.10 kernel and JFS
> as module.I think this might be related to the VM changes that went into
> the kernel...System Slackware Linux 8.0 with jfs built as module.Here is the
> output of the make modules failure when compiling 2.4.10:
>
> -- begin --
>
> make -C jfs modules
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.10/fs/jfs'
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.10/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wno-trigraphs -O2
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
> -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include
> /usr/src/linux-2.4.10/include/linux/modversions.h -D_JFS
> -D_JFS_DEBUG -D_JFS_4K -c -o jfs_metapage.o jfs_metapage.c
> jfs_metapage.c: In function `release_metapage':
> jfs_metapage.c:547: structure has no member named `age'
> make[2]: *** [jfs_metapage.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.10/fs/jfs'
> make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_jfs] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.10/fs'
> make: *** [_mod_fs] Error 2
The problem started with 2.4.10-pre11, where the major VM changes by
Andrea Arkangeli had been merged. I did tests with the -pre1; -pre10
trees and they compiled perfectly.
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
