Since the bug database has been transitioned to the SourceForge bug 
database (http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/bugs/?group_id=35) my 
bug still lives on..  I'll recreate the info here.  If anyone would like 
I'll create another (new) bug entry for this new database.

[root@peters /root]# fsck.jfs -v /dev/hda2
fsck.jfs version 1.0.10, 28-Nov-2001
The current device is:  /dev/hda2
(chklog) FSCK  Open(...READ/WRITE EXCLUSIVE...) returned rc = 0
(chklog) FSCK  Primary superblock is valid.
(chklog) FSCK  The type of file system for the device is JFS.
Block size in bytes:  4096
File system size in blocks:  1050249
Phase 0 - Replay Journal Log
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Journal log is now open.  (major = 0x00, minor = 
0x00)
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for ReDoPage:  (d) 4096 bytes 
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for NoDoFile:  (d) 4096 bytes 
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for BMap:  (d) 26704 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for IMap:  (d) 17552 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for IMap:  (d) 2048 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for IMap:  (d) 2048 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for IMap:  (d) 2048 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Allocating for IMap:  (d) 2048 bytes
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:   markBmap: Block number(s) out of range 
(start=0x06f6f732e6c, length=(d)7500910).
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Error in volume (d) 0.
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Invalid volume block number (0x06f6f732e6c).
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Log record for Sync Point at:    0x04fb958
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Not rebuilding the Inode Alloc Map because fsck 
will be doing it.
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Write Inode Alloc Map control page failed in 
UpdateMaps().
(chklog) FSCK:LOGREDO:  Unable to update map(s).
logredo failed (rc=-265).  FSCK continuing.
Phase 1 - Check Blocks, Files/Directories, and Directory Entries.
(chklog) FSCK  Invalid data (45) detected in file system object DF233473.
(chklog) FSCK  File system object DF233473 has corrupt data (40).
(chklog) FSCK  processing terminated:  12/17/2001 17.30.34   with return 
code: -11010.

[root@peters /root]# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.16-1 (root@peters) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat 
Linux 7.1 2.96-85)) #2 SMP Mon Dec 17 12:02:58 CST 2001         
[root@peters /root]# cat /proc/ide/hda/geometry
physical     59554/16/63
logical      3736/255/63
[root@peters /root]#



All of this happened after a legitimate system failure 
(crash/power-outage)...  So that's why I feel it is still relevant. 
 I've lost the info on the original bug (#141 in the old database) so I 
don't remember what version of JFS I had that created this image 
(somewhere around 1.0.3 I believe.)  I can provide any sort of 
trace/dump info necessary.

Hope this helps.

Peter Smith


Peter Smith wrote:

> No problem, I always try to follow up--thanks for the response.
>
> Yes I'm using the 1.0.4 utilities and did run the new fsck.jfs .
>
> Yes the output is exactly character-for-character the same.
>
> Let me know if I can be of more help.
>
> Peter
>
>
> Barry Arndt wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> Thanks for your continued feedback and for providing information
>> about the problem.  The more we know, the better.
>>
>> Did you also install the 1.0.4 utilities and run with the new fsck.jfs?
>> (The utilities are now separate from the jfs tar ball, so you must
>> unzip them and execute make, make install, to copy the new
>> versions into /sbin.)  We fixed an fsck problem in 1.0.4 that may
>> have an effect on the problem you are experiencing.
>>
>> If you are using the new 1.0.4 fsck.jfs, is the output the same as
>> reported in JFS Bug 141?  If not, let me know.
>>
>> Thanks again for your feedback.
>>
>> Barry Arndt
>> IBM Linux Technology Center
>> JFS for Linux http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jfs
>> (512) 838-0723   t/l 678-0723
>>
>>
>> Peter Smith 
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@www-126.southbury.usf.ibm.com
>> on 09-05-2001 10:36:08 AM
>>
>> Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> cc:
>> Subject:  [Jfs-discussion] FYI: JFS Bug 141 / Linux v2.4.9 / Jfs v1.0.4
>>      still valid
>>
>>
>>
>> http://dwoss.lotus.com/developer/opensource/jfs/bugs/incoming?id=141
>>
>> This is still giving the same results under kernel v2.4.9 (smp), jfs
>> v1.0.4 on my corrupted hda2.  No change as of yet.
>>
>> I've noticed something interesting with the logdump command:
>>
>> [root@peters output]# logdump -a /dev/hda2
>> Vol_Label : /dev/hda2
>> FSCK:LOGREDO:  The Journal Log has wrapped.
>> FSCK:LOGREDO:   logRead: Log wrapped over itself (lognumread = (d) 
>> (351).
>> log read failed 0x56af7c
>> JFS_LOGDUMP: The current JFS log has been dumped into ./jfslog.dmp
>> [root@peters output]# la
>>
>> Hope I am being helpful.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jfs-discussion mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion 
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jfs-discussion mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion



_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to