Sean, Use release 1.0.12 of the utilities, release 1.0.13 of fsck.jfs has a problem.
Thanks, Steve Sean Gollschewsky wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've had a minor disaster with one of my JFS partitions. It's only > minor due to the nature of the data that I may have lost, not the actual > incident... > > I had about 6 or 7 downloads writing to the file system, and I was > watching a movie file (750mb) residing on the JFS partition shared with > Samba. After a few seconds of watching the movie, my linux machine > locked solid - the only thing that caused any response was the Magic > Sysreq key which caused a reboot. The JFS file system wouldn't mount at > boot, so I attempted a fsck. > > gollo:/# fsck -t jfs -nv /dev/hda4 > fsck 1.25 (20-Sep-2001) > fsck.jfs version 1.0.13, 25-Jan-2002 > The current device is: /dev/hda4 > (chklog) FSCK Open(...READONLY...) returned rc = 0 > > (chklog) FSCK Invalid filesystem size in the superblock (P). > > (chklog) FSCK Primary superblock is corrupt. > > (chklog) FSCK Invalid filesystem size in the superblock (S). > > (chklog) FSCK Secondary superblock is corrupt. > > Superblock is corrupt and cannot be repaired because > both primary and secondary copies are corrupt. > > FSCK CANNOT CONTINUE. > > gollo:/# > > I had just upgraded to JFS 1.0.13 (from 1.0.9) on the previous boot of > the machine. Running 2.4.18-pre7, with LVM 1.0.2 - the jfs filesystem > is running on a logical volume. > > Is there any hope of recovery? > > TIA, > > Gollo. > > _______________________________________________ > Jfs-discussion mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
