Daniel,

Thanks for sending the superblocks.  I was hoping that there were
errors in the superblocks that we could repair manually to try to
salvage what you had on the device, but such was not the case.
Whatever happened on your machine completely overwrote the
JFS primary and secondary superblocks, and who knows what
else.  The superblocks are irreparable.

Barry Arndt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Linux Technology Center
JFS for Linux http://oss.software.ibm.com/jfs


Daniel Savard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com on 02-27-2002
12:39:04 PM

Sent by:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:    [Jfs-discussion] fsck fails



I am using version 1.0.15 of jfs along with kernel 2.4.17 and LVM 1.0.3.

Due to a mistake, I ran into a problem with LVM and I had to recover
everything. For most of my stuff, everything went fine and I am up and
running. However, I still have a jfs file system which refuses to pass
the fsck test.

Here is the output from the fsck.jfs command:

------------- BEGIN -------------------
[root@einstein /]# fsck.jfs /dev/datavg/home
fsck.jfs version 1.0.15, 15-Feb-2002

The superblock does not describe a correct jfs file system.

If device /dev/datavg/home is valid and contains a jfs file system,
then both the primary and secondary superblocks are corrupt
and cannot be repaired, and fsck cannot continue.

Otherwise, make sure the entered device /dev/datavg/home is correct.
--------------- END -------------------------

My question: Is there anything I can try in order to recover the
filesystem or partial informations from it?

--

=======================================
Daniel Savard

Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================================


_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion


_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to