On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:14:57PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> I've just received the most recent c't magazine, which has an
> interesting article/comparison of the journaled file systems in
> the linux world - xfs, jfs, ext3, reiser ....
>
> JFS doesn't get a particularly honourable report - and the
> description and experiences as described in the article certainly don't
> match my own.
>
> Anyone else read this article ?
Sure, the c't appeared in my inbox today in the morning, as it does in
alomost every German-speaking hacker's :)
But in my regular stree-testings using fsstress and cerberus I'm
absoloutly unable to reproduce is using a variety of test enviroments.
On the other hand JFS <= 1.0.14 had a very similar bug when built
modular (I really wonder why the QA of the distributors shipping JFS
didn't found it - once I built a modular JFS on my test machines I was
able to trigger it within a few minutes).
I've Cc'ed Oliver so he can comment on the exact test enviroment
(Kernel, Hardware, JFS-Version, Config-Options).
Christoph
--
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
