Not sure if this is useful, now that 1.0.16 is out, but just before
upgrading to use jfs-1.0.16 I found the assertion below in my logs.
I also show the output of ksymoops, which lists more jfs stuff,
which I do not understand...
I still run 2.4.18-rc4 on Dual PPro200 with SuSE 7.1.
Greetings,
Peter.
________________________________________________________________________
Mar 13 12:19:27 leo kernel: diRead: i_ino != di_number
Mar 13 12:19:34 leo last message repeated 2 times
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: assert(list_empty(&JFS_IP(ip)->mp_list))
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: invalid operand: 0000
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: CPU: 0
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: EIP: 0010:[<d08307f1>] Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: eax: 00000029 ebx: c51ff840 ecx: 00000002 edx:
00000001
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: esi: c14d1f5c edi: cc3aea48 ebp: c14d1f64 esp:
c14d1f1c
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 5, stackpage=c14d1000)
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: Stack: d0843fb3 d08445a0 c51ff840 c014783a c51ff840
c51ff840 c01478b7 c51ff840
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: cc3aec28 cc3aec20 c0147b0a c14d1f5c 0000000b
000001d0 00000020 000001bf
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: ce31f628 c6fe8de8 00000006 c0147b47 00000000
c012db7d 00000006 000001d0
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: Call Trace: [<d0843fb3>] [<d08445a0>] [<c014783a>]
[<c01478b7>] [<c0147b0a>]
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: [<c0147b47>] [<c012db7d>] [<c012dbcf>] [<c012dc63>]
[<c012dcbe>] [<c012ddcd>]
Mar 13 12:23:38 leo kernel: [<c01055a4>]
Mar 13 12:23:39 leo kernel: Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 08 8b 93 20 01 00 00 8d 42 5c 39 42 5c
74 14 68
>>EIP; d08307f1 <[jfs]diClearExtension+39/a9> <=====
Trace; d0843fb3 <[jfs].rodata.start+1473/3c5e>
Trace; d08445a0 <[jfs].rodata.start+1a60/3c5e>
Trace; c014783a <clear_inode+ba/fc>
Trace; c01478b7 <dispose_list+3b/54>
Trace; c0147b0a <prune_icache+be/e0>
Trace; c0147b47 <shrink_icache_memory+1b/30>
Trace; c012db7d <shrink_caches+6d/88>
Trace; c012dbcf <try_to_free_pages+37/58>
Trace; c012dc63 <kswapd_balance_pgdat+43/8c>
Trace; c012dcbe <kswapd_balance+12/28>
Trace; c012ddcd <kswapd+99/b4>
Trace; c01055a4 <kernel_thread+28/38>
Code; d08307f1 <[jfs]diClearExtension+39/a9>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; d08307f1 <[jfs]diClearExtension+39/a9> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; d08307f3 <[jfs]diClearExtension+3b/a9>
2: 83 c4 08 add $0x8,%esp
Code; d08307f6 <[jfs]diClearExtension+3e/a9>
5: 8b 93 20 01 00 00 mov 0x120(%ebx),%edx
Code; d08307fc <[jfs]diClearExtension+44/a9>
b: 8d 42 5c lea 0x5c(%edx),%eax
Code; d08307ff <[jfs]diClearExtension+47/a9>
e: 39 42 5c cmp %eax,0x5c(%edx)
Code; d0830802 <[jfs]diClearExtension+4a/a9>
11: 74 14 je 27 <_EIP+0x27> d0830818
<[jfs]diClearExtension+60/a9>
Code; d0830804 <[jfs]diClearExtension+4c/a9>
13: 68 00 00 00 00 push $0x0
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
