On Thursday 09 May 2002 10:58, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> The jfs driver in 2.5.14-dj2 contains 11 lines that write to
> i_version, but i_version is nowhere read.
>
> Could you apply the attached patch and remove the references? It
> seems someone copied these lines from ext2, and ext2 uses i_version &
> f_version to optimize readdir()+lseek().

Yeah, I'm sure when I first ported the code to Linux, I figured since it 
was in the common part of the inode that it should be kept up to date.  
I didn't bother to find out if it would be used anywhere.  Grepping 
through the code, there are other filesystems that do the same thing 
but never used i_version.

>
> The patch is untested due to the lack of test volumes.

I've got some more pressing things to do right now, but I'll try to get 
to this soon.

-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to