On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 13:08, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Oct 24, 2002 18:45 +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote: > > +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > | quotas | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled | > > | | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data | > > +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > Granted that I have never used quotas, so it is possible that I > am incorrect. However, my understanding is that yes, you do need > data-journaled quota files to ensure that your quota tables don't miss > some operations after a crash. However, you can separately select > data journaling for files in ext3 (via chattr), even if the rest of > the filesystem is using data=ordered (the default).
data journaling on the quota files is better. Some quota updates (dqput calling commit_dquot) are done only by clear_inode(), which should happen outside the transaction and won't be grouped with the actual metadata change. -chris _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion