On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:04, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Ah, then it's a well-known 2.95 parser bug (sorry for not looking
> better at it when sending my initial report). The following
> alternative patch is sufficient to fix the compilation with 2.95
> (it's your choice which of the two patches you prefer):
>
> --- linux-2.5.60-full/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.h.old 2003-02-12
> 15:59:14.000000000 +0100 +++
> linux-2.5.60-full/fs/jfs/jfs_debug.h 2003-02-12 15:59:35.000000000
> +0100 @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
> #define jfs_err(fmt, arg...) do { \
> if (jfsloglevel >= JFS_LOGLEVEL_ERR) \
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s:%d " fmt "\n", \
> - __FILE__, __LINE__, ## arg); \
> + __FILE__ , __LINE__ , ## arg); \
> } while (0)
>
> /*
Interesting that the assert() macro in the same file is very similar,
but apparently doesn't have the same problem. Do you know if it's tied
to the ## operator? I'm not emotionally attached to __FILE__ and
__LINE__, so I'll just go with removing them, unless anyone wants to
change my mind.
Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
