On Monday 23 June 2003 15:33, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > > I think I found the problem. The patch below should fix it. I will > try to reproduce the problem and verify that this patch works.
I wasn't able to reproduce the trap (which depends on the contents of uninitialized memory) but I was able to verify that it fixes a problem where changes to a directory got lost. I'm convinced the patch is good. -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
