--- Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 09:06, Bjoern JACKE wrote: > > Hi, > >
> > Even if all people use the same encoding, > > let's say UTF-8, problems come up when there are RPMs or any > kind of > > archives which bring files whose names are not validly UTF-8 > encoded, > > maybe in latin1 or EUC_JP. > > These files can simply not be created on JFS, which leads to > > > unforeseeable problems. Even if one would use an encoding > like > > iocharset=iso8859-1, which is 8-bit, utf-8 cannot be created > because > > not all 255 possible characters are valid in iso8859-1. > > Actually, I believe that the iso8859-1 charset was fixed in > the 2.6 > kernel so that all 8-bit characters are represented. > Sorry for asking What character set should we use default when we mount a jfs filesystem with a 2.6 kernel ? I use utf8 but sometimes i have the problem described above. > I believe the new-and-improved iso8859-1 charset provides a > good > solution. Is the fix in the 2.6 kernel sufficient, or does > someone need > to push the iso8859-1 fix back to the 2.4 kernel? > > > > > Björn > -- > David Kleikamp > IBM Linux Technology Center ===== -- A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in. Kim Alm on a.s.r. _________________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
