On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:39:26AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > A lot of this is actually optional features the other FS don't have, > like support for separate realtime volumes and compat code for old > revisions, journaled quotas etc. I think you could > relatively easily do a "mini xfs" that would be a lot smaller.
And a whole lot of code to stay somewhat in sync with other codebases.. _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
