On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 11:57 +0100, Gilles Meier wrote: > Tkanks both of you... > > With using the first proposal from parted, both superblocks seem to be > sane (identical to the first superblock from the other propasal)... > But there's always this FS size problem. > > Parted refuse to modify the size of a JFS filesystem :( > > May jfs_fsck say that superblocks are corrupted "only" if the size of > the FS don't match with the size of partition ?
Yes, it would do this. Running with the -v flag (verbose) should give you a better error message. It should probably do this without the -v flag. I'll add that to my to-do list. > Or is there another problem ? I hope not. > If I've fine understood, shrinking a JFS filesystem size is impossible, > so the only way is to grow the partition size from 238433.21Mb to > 238472.688 Mb. Parted says me that opening a JFS partition isn't yet > implemented, so does someone know how to perform this operation ? Raw > writing in the table ? You need to delete the the partition, then create a new partition filling the whole disk (rebooting afterward), and you should be okay. -- Dave Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
