Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:38 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
Yeah, that seems to fix it for this particular case. I wonder if
we're just delaying the inevitable though? Would it make sense to
pre-allocate tlocks somehow before holding important semaphores?
Admittedly, my understanding of the txnmgr is a bit limited, so this
may be total nonsense.
That sounds like a good idea. I'm not sure how easy that will be to
implement, but I'll take a look at it.
Also, is it maybe time to increase the default number of locks? We had
similar problems on large systems in SLES9 testing and we still have to
run SPECSFS with TxLocks set to 65k.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
