to this one I can could use to generate a superblock on an actual disk.
On Jan 27, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
I expected that to at least get by the superblock check. Can you run fsck.jfs again with the -v flag? You can also use jfs_debug to see if the superblock looks somewhat sane.
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 13:51 -0600, Sean Murphy wrote:-- David KleikampI tried copying in the fresh superblock and ended up with this. Anything else? It about 10 days worth of computing on there, so I'm only spending another few hours on it before we just regenerate it all.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fsck.jfs -f /dev/VolGroup00/lvol0 fsck.jfs version 1.1.7, 22-Jul-2004 processing started: 1/27/2005 13.49.9 The current device is: /dev/VolGroup00/lvol0 Superblock is corrupt and cannot be repaired since both primary and secondary copies are corrupt.
CANNOT CONTINUE.
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs- discussion
Sean Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/jfs-discussion
