I think that more and more applications have become more and more
graphic, and with concentration on keeping up with that, Utilities must
have "slipped through the cracks," as they say. 

Bye for now,

Carolyn


-----Original Message-----
From: Jfw [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Curtis
Delzer via Jfw
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 1:08 AM
To: The Jaws for Windows support list. <[email protected]>
Cc: Curtis Delzer <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Merge Utility, Why It's Missing, Explained

I mean, talk about blowing smoke, that is . . . definitely.
That should always be a property of the new update, to make sure your
personalized settings are integrated, and just because something new is
so different, that only means that the developer must take care of the
customer base so that the differences can be handled by customized
settings which can be applied to the newer version. Talk about a crock of
double talk, "working on it," when if the plan had been to not include a
merge utility, that should have been in the stage of development from the
get go, not "we're working on it," now.
If a setting is so new, then double duh! some kind of utility to upgrade
and update settings should be employed, not thrown into the discard.
Thinking with their lack of ideas, it seems to me. How about that,
"thinking with their lack of ideas."
That's like saying, when the guy snores next to you as you whack him him
to wake him up, "hey! hey!" "Wake up and go to sleep."
duh! and double duh! Pure and simple, someone just . . . screwed up, and
there is no denial that can make up for that.



At 08:01 PM 11/4/2015, you wrote:
>Well, I'm sorry!  FS telling us that they are "working on it" is just 
>not good enough!
>
>Can you tell that I'm upset?
>
>Jim H
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Melissa Stott [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 9:49 PM
>To: The Jaws for Windows support list. <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Merge Utility, Why It's Missing, Explained
>
>I agree with Mike.  I'm sure that they are working on something.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mike B via Jfw
>Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 9:36 PM
>To: The Jaws for Windows support list.
>Cc: Mike B
>Subject: Merge Utility, Why It's Missing, Explained
>
>Hi All,
>
>There's no need to craft a petition or anything else.  Below tells 
>about the Merge Utility & why it's missing in Jaws 17, for now anyways.

>This comes from What's new in Jaws 17.
>
>Merge Utility No Longer Available
>
>Major changes have been made to improve the JAWS localization process. 
>This included reorganizing many of the JAWS settings files. Due to 
>these changes, the Merge utility is no longer installed with JAWS 17 as 
>settings from prior versions cannot be merged. We are planning a 
>solution for the future which will replace this utility and provide an 
>even greater benefit for our customers.
>
>Take care.
>Mike
>This email was sent from my, iBarstool.  Go Dodgers, next year anyways!
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Tom Behler via Jfw
>To: 'The Jaws for Windows support list.'
>Cc: Tom Behler
>Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 5:32 PM
>Subject: RE: merge utility
>
>
>I don't know how appropriate or beneficial this could be, but if 
>someone on the list would be willing to craft a petition regarding this 
>issue, we might be able to get enough signitures to make an impact.
>
>Sometimes, I just scratch my head at these kinds of decisions.
>
>I certainly will sign any such petition, if it is created.
>
>I'm looking to upgrade to Jaws 17, possibly during the college teaching 
>semester break, but that won't be for about 8 weeks for me at this 
>point, and I sure would like to have the use of the merge utilities
feature again.
>I know there have been issues with it at times, but the convenience and 
>ease of using it far outweighs any problems, in my opinion.
>
>Dr.  Tom Behler from Michigan
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jfw [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian 
>Spratt via Jfw
>Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 5:58 PM
>To: The Jaws for Windows support list.
>Cc: Adrian Spratt
>Subject: RE: merge utility
>
>I'm going to write to FS Tech Support and ask for this deficiency to be 
>fixed. I hope others will do the same so they realize how important this
is.
>Can you imagine a popular commercial application forcing users to start 
>all over again with the settings they've created over the course of 
>years? Note that "merge" was misspelled in the subject line, which I've
corrected.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jfw [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Maria 
>Campbell via Jfw
>Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 5:43 PM
>To: The Jaws for Windows support list.
>Cc: Maria Campbell
>Subject: Re: murge utility
>
>I agree completely.  Enough said.
>
>On 11/4/2015 4:23 PM, Aidan via Jfw wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm very upset for fs removing the murg utility option in jaws 17.
> > They have the excuse that older version settings can know longer 
> > being important in 17. I don't know if I must laugh. If they new 
> > that it would happen, why did they not make a priority to implement 
> > a replacement tool wich could be in 17?
> > Now you have to manually change everything? Is it possible perhaps 
> > to use the settings packager to acomplish that?
> > I find it so tragic that they spend the hole year on smart 
> > navigation, wich is not even such a remarkable feature, really this 
> > was going to be more bennifishil to more people and now that its not 
> > ready it will affect everyone negatively.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jfw mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
> >
>
>--
>
>Sunny Day
>Maria Campbell
>[email protected]
>
>Trials without God will break you. Trials with God will make you.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jfw mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jfw mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jfw mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
>-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
>scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.the-jdh.com/pipermail/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com/attachments/2
>01511
>04/fc6b00ac/attachment.html>
>_______________________________________________
>Jfw mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Jfw mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.the-jdh.com/pipermail/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com/attachments/201
51104/b6bba9df/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Jfw mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com


_______________________________________________
Jfw mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.the-jdh.com/mailman/listinfo/jfw_lists.the-jdh.com

Reply via email to