From: "Lisle, Teddy (DMS) (CHRDMS1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Testing was a good idea, though. After all, Eloquence shouldn't have been time/date dependent, and look what happened there. Ted - Visit the jfw ml web page: http://yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au/~nallan/jfw
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? -Reply Robert R. Matti
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? Cathy
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? David Poehlman
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? bill cameron
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? Darrell Shandrow
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? David Poehlman
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? bill cameron
- Re: y2k, bug or bunk? bill cameron
- Re: y2k, bug or b... Nick Allan
- RE: y2k, bug or bunk? Lisle, Teddy (DMS) (CHRDMS1)
- RE: y2k, bug or bunk? Lisle, Teddy (DMS) (CHRDMS1)
- RE: y2k, bug or bunk? Test Manager
- RE: y2k, bug or bunk? Carol Pearson
