I thought I'd sent it privately, sorry. I actually don't know what you mean
by one way. My only intention was to get better instruction from some of
you. Thats it! After talking to another lister, who by the way complained
to me about the same thing, I thought, well no ones going to say anything,
maybe I should. But please forgive me for not making sure that it wasn't
sent privately. I would appreciate you letting me know what one way means
however?


At 06:35 AM 3/17/99 -0800, you wrote:
>If you didn't want people to take this the wrong way, you never should have
>written it. It is very difficult to help someone when you are using one way
>communication paricularly when problems are not explained clearly.
>M Seelig
>
>At 12:30 AM 3/16/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>Alex,
>>
>>      Last week I sent a letter to the entire group concerning poor instruction
>>given from people in general. Now its not that I don't totally appreciate
>>the help, every one does. Maybe me as much as anybody, cause I feel I know
>>the least. But we are all trying to keep up with the really good ones, so
>>we can pull in as much as we can. This is important stuff for me, and I
>>have fun too.
>>      I saw your email yesterday and couldn't help but try your instructions on
>>how to make Eloquence and wav files play at the same time. I went in using
>>insert/f6, then control/shift/d for default, then control/a cause you
>>didn't say how to get into the advanced dialog box, and nothing happened, I
>>mena I didn't come close to finding what I was supposed to look for. At
>>least nothing I could recognize. Why? Maybe because the instruction didn't
>>say what to look for exactly, or even in vivid description. 
>>      Now please don't take this the wrong way. I feel fortunate to have persons
>>such as yourself on this list, cause if I didn't, I'd have nothing to draw
>>from. In fact, every one is important on this list to me at least.
>>      But I think every one has to do something about the vague and flimsey
>>instruction given because if this continues, the only people that will gain
>>from this list, are the people who give instruction, cause they have a
>>lingo all untoo themselves.
>>      Again, please don't take this the wrong way, but think of us novisses when
>>you create an instruction. think, maybe they won't know how to get into
>>advanced dialog box, and maybe once they get there, they won't really know
>>what to look for, after all, the box needed to be checked doesn't really
>>explain a whole lot. Understand?
>>      
>>      Thank you for all your help,
>>
>>
>>At 05:41 AM 3/16/99 -0000, you wrote:
>>>Linda, I've come a bit late to the party for this one, but I think I can
fix
>>>your problem.  What you need to do is to go into configuration manager, by
>>>pressing insert+6, and then load the default configuration by pressing
>>>ctrl+shift+d. then go to the advanced settings dialog box (I think).  there
>>>is a setting which allows you to play wav files at the same time as
>>>eloquence runs.
>>>I hope this helps.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: lindagaitskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Date: 14 March 1999 12:15
>>>Subject: sound in email
>>>
>>>
>>>>i am a new subscriber with jaws 3.2 and elequence but only a built in
sound
>>>>card.i cannot get any sound to indicate new messages.is this because i
need
>>>>an external speach synthesiser?
>>>>regards
>>>>linda
>>>>
>>>>-
>>>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>>
>>>-
>>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>>
>>>
>>Scott - The Raging Bass Man
>>
>>-
>>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Scott - The Raging Bass Man

-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

Reply via email to