Yes, Nick and Jason and all,
I had gathered (by the time I got to your posts) that the HJ scripts were a
little different and folk are saying they're not as good.
(Having not yet upgraded to IE5 I can't comment on that.)
However, I am concerned, as a number of us have been in the past, about the
issue of scripts being written both by mailing list members and HJ; thus a
duplication of work which is not always necessary or helpful.
I feel there's just not enough consultation (possibly from HJ's side) on
this. After all, if the scripts already submitted, which have been
available for a little while now, are still better than HJ's, why did they
waste their time preparing more? It just doesn't make sense!
I won't write to HJ until I have a little more feedback, but maybe I will
if there's enough joint concern on this.
--
Carol Pearson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
