Thank you for that post,
In an e-mail from the company, I "believe" that I was told in early
march that the msaa functionality equivalent to WindowEyes would be in 3.3.
Now I have asked people who have 3.3--and perhaps I did not ask the
question well enough--but I hear what you, sir, referred to.
Since we all appreciate this software and its versatility, then would
not HJ have a great opportunity to write scripts to give us the
functionality that others besides yourself have already referred to? The R
D efforts regarding JAWS have created excellent software.
It is not too late to keep that fine record going and make a good thing
better via patches or whatever?
Also when people refer to JAWS versions --so a sizable minority are for
the present with 3.2--could people please say "JAWS 3.3 or JAWS 3.2" so we
know to what the comments refer to?
And JAWs is fine software--that is not the issue here-- every good thing
can bre improved.sticking&
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
