The question should be posed to the Henter-Joyce script writers who devised
the upgrade. However, from what I've seen in the jfw3.3 scripting language,
everything seems to be an upgrade, rather than deletions or performance
changes.
In other words, I think that all the scripts written for 3.2 would be valid
in 3.3.
Hope this helps.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Tusing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 1999 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: Should the scripts, written for jaws 3.2 be good for 3.3?
> Fantastic question! May i please ask that question "but in the reverse"?
> Are there ANY scripts like the I C Q ones or others that were written for
> 3.2 that do not work WELL with 3.3? We might as well know that information
> before upgrading to 3.3
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Muhammad Fazil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: JFW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 8:12 AM
> Subject: Should the scripts, written for jaws 3.2 be good for 3.3?
>
>
> > I'm using microsoft chat that is very well-supported by jfw 3.2 because
of
> > the scripts written by somebody. Now having been upgrated to 3.3, I did
> not
> > remove my 3.2 and am still hanging on to it, just in case. My question
> is,
> > can I install the scripts in to directory of Jfw33, that was originally
> > written for jfw3.2?
> >
> > Thanks! Best regards,
> > Muhammad Fazil,
> > Ph.D Candidate, Department of Asian Studies, University of British
> Columbia,
> > Vancouver BC, Canada.
> > ENQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU DO ALL DAY!
> > Mentes quaerentes volunt scire quid in Hadei facias totum diem!
> >
> > -
> > Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
> >
>
> -
> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
