Hello Listers,
The below uncalled for message created over 25 reply or comment messages,
none of which enhanced or aided in the understanding or use of JFW so is it
any wonder that there are often complaints regarding the heavy list traffic!
I do not intend for this message to further clog the JFW users list so if
anyone wants to comment please reply to me privately & for those that don't
know how to reply to author or pick the sender's address from the header,
my address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards to all,
Bob Matti
____________
At 09:05 AM 8/9/1999 , Michael Capelle wrote:
>Hi listers,
>I usually Window-Eyes from GW Micro but thought I would try the demo of
>JFW 3.3
>
>I am very unhappy with it because of the fucus issues it has under Win 95.
>
>an example of this is when I am in ICQ, and I go to another application,
>the JFW cursor has very difficult time in telling me where I am.
>Window-Eyes is 100000 times better at this.
>I hate to bring you JAWS users down, but I would not buy JFW if u gave me
>a million dollars for it.
>I will agree though, it does work in some applications like IE, but still
>I don't like JFW at all.
>There could be many improvements like Window-Eyes is better.
>WE is a lot better than JFW
>
>I don't want to bash JFW, but JFW should stand for Junk for Windows
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
