Maybe so, but not as bad as Peter says it is. He needs to come up to the
21st century. I wonder if he will have a y2k problem.
At 09:35 PM 10/21/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I am for JFW all the way! But I do have to admit, their teck support is
>just a tad slow some times.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: David Poehlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 8:36 PM
>Subject: Re: jfw gets bashed
>
>
>> like I said When someone else sent this to me and asked for a
>> summation.
>> Balderdash!
>> he obviously has not yet used the latest version with ie and I still
>> hold that much of what he says is subjective and some of it is down
>> right flaky.
>> I called for in his first round and still call for objective reviews.
>>
>> --
>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>> Touching The Internet:
>> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Voice: 301.949.7599
>> ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
>> http://poehlman.clark.net
>> Dynamic Solutions Inc.
>> Best of service
>> for your small business
>> network needs!
>> http://www.dnsolutions.com
>>
>> ---sig off---
>> -
>> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Walter
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
