This is the reason we should come together and preserve tribal culture.

Rita.

On 08/07/2008, Surya Dash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>  *Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org.in/forum * <http://www.jharkhand.org.in>
>
> *  *
>
>
> *No big projects in tribal areas: GoM
> Chetan 
> Chauhan<http://www.hindustantimes.com/Search/Search.aspx?q=Chetan%20Chauhan&nodate=1>,
> Hindustan Times*
> Email Author<[EMAIL PROTECTED]:%20GoM>
> New Delhi, July 08, 2008
>
> For those eyeing tribal areas for starting big projects, there is some bad
> news. A Group of Ministers has cleared the draft tribal policy disallowing
> projects that can lead to huge displacement of tribal population.
>
> The policy, cleared by GoM headed by Home Minister Shivraj Patel, will now
> be placed before the cabinet for its approval, a senior tribal affairs
> ministry official said. "A cabinet note has already been prepared," the
> official said.
>
> The cabinet constituted a GoM in July 2007 to discuss contentious issues in
> the draft tribal policy after several Union ministers objected to clauses on
> restriction on starting new projects, regulations for rehabilitation of
> displaced tribals and ensuring benefit for tribals from new projects.
>
> The GoM has reportedly accepted the ministry's viewpoint that displacement
> resulting from large projects, even if they are in public interest, causes
> an "irreparable" damage to tribal culture and convert them from land
> managers to daily wagers.
>
> However, the GoM has asked the ministry to define big projects in clearer
> terms. The draft policy had stated that projects that lead to displacement
> of 50,000 people, majority of whom are tribals, should not be undertaken.
> The ministry had also said that big projects also cause a huge damage to
> natural flora and fauna, 63 per cent of which is in 50 tribal districts of
> India.
>
> The new policy, if notified, can mean end of road for big mining projects
> in tribal areas, which cover 15 per cent of geographical area of the
> country. Starting projects like Pasco Steel in tribal belt of Orissa, which
> has caused a lot of resentment, would become difficult once the policy comes
> into force, a ministry official admitted.
>
> In case of displacement, the policy says that tribals would get land for
> land in the tribal zone itself so that they can sustain their livelihood
> through traditional methods. The GoM has also agreed for conducting
> mandatory social impact assessment before starting projects in tribal areas.
>
> The policy also envisages improvement in Human Development Index of
> tribals, which has plummeted to the lowest level since Independence. "The
> out of school children, school drop out rate and literacy rates among tribal
> girls is among the lowest for different social groups in India," the draft
> tribal policy said. The tribal affairs ministry expected to put the policy
> for cabinet consideration before the end of July. "The tribal affairs
> minister has already spoken to the prime minister in this regard," a
> ministry official said.
>
>
> http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=6ebb0a6c-0af8-46a7-8261-5339f7407f6a&&Headline=No+big+projects+in+tribal+areas%3a+GoM
>
>
>
>  *Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand.org.in/forum * <http://www.jharkhand.org.in>
>
> *  *
>
>
>  
>



-- 
rita roy chowdhury

Reply via email to