1.

*Muslim Women:
The Dangerous Triangle*

*By Nigar Ataulla*

05 August, 2008
*Countercurrents.org*
*F*our years ago, I was invited to an inter-faith dialogue programme in
Bangalore organised by a Christian human rights group. Speakers from
different religious communities were on the panel and they were to talk
about the concept of social justice in their own religious traditions.

After my brief talk on the notion of justice in Islam, I was handed a long
list of questions, some of which, predictably, read like this: Why cannot a
Muslim have four husbands? Why aren't Muslim men required to wear veils?
Doesn't a Muslim woman feel suppressed in a burkha? How can a man declare
triple talaq in one sitting? And, curiously enough, why did Jemima Khan
marry Imran Khan?

Think of a Muslim woman and the things that immediately flash across in the
minds of many Muslims and non-Muslims alike are triple talaq, polygamy and
the veil. Is that all a Muslim woman is known for? Does not a Muslim woman
have her own identity, her own individuality? Why cannot society look upon a
Muslim woman as just another human being, like everybody else, and not a
marked out, exoticised or specially branded creature?

In the Indian context, when one talks of the status of Muslim women, the
focus invariably falls on triple talaq in one sitting, polygamy and hijab. I
choose to call this the "dangerous triangle".

Last month, the Mumbai-based Centre for Study of Society and Secularism
(CSSS) and the Institute of Islamic Studies organised a training programme
on "The Rights of Muslim Women in the Quran—Theory and Practice". Over 50
participants from various states across India came together to share their
experiences, views and thoughts. While the majority were women activists
(Muslims as well as others), there were a sprinkling of male activists too.
Most of the activists at the training programme worked at the grassroots
level, in slums and villages.

The key presenter at the workshop was the noted writer, Islamic scholar and
social activist Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer, who is also the chairperson of the
CSSS. His discussion focused on the position of women before Islam,
references to women in the Quran and evolution of Islamic jurisprudence. He
stressed that women should read the Quran from what he called a 'feminist'
point of view. "The Quran has innumerable verses in favour of women. But men
sometimes misinterpret verses related to polygamy and hijab to suit their
whims and fancies," he said.

Maulana Mohammad Shoaib Koti, a well-known Islamic scholar based in Mumbai,
talked about the freedom of expression for women in Islam. He recalled how
Muslim women during the days of the Prophet asked questions directly to him
without any male intervention. He also referred to the high status enjoyed
by women scholars of Hadith and Quran during those days.

Qutub Jehan Kidwai, convenor of the Institute of Islamic Studies, shared her
observations of Muslim personal law reforms in Muslim countries. Mehmood
Hasan, a film maker from Bangladesh, presented an engaging (and disturbing)
documentary film on the practice of arbitrary triple talaq. The story, woven
around a Bangladeshi family, ends on a positive note, proclaiming that
triple talaq has no sanction in Islam. A noted advocate from Mumbai, Nilofer
Akhtar elaborated on Supreme Court judgments in favour of Muslim women. She
lamented the fact that many Muslims were not sufficiently aware of numerous
laws relating to maintenance after divorce. Mufti Inamullah Khan, a scholar
and activist, supported the call for codification of Muslim Personal Law in
India.

In her presentation, Naish Hasan, founder of the Lucknow-based Bharatiya
Muslim Mahila Andolan, spoke about her experiences of working with Muslim
women in different parts of the country. Women in rural areas were most
victimized through violation of their rights and also domestic violence.
"With no access to education, most rural Muslim women have no idea about the
courts and the laws and even what the Quran says about women's rights. The
need of the hour is to take up these cases and help women get their due
rights. They become easy victims, and run from pillar to post when men
desert them, dump triple talaq on them and irresponsibly use polygamy as
their birthright," she said.


I posed a question to a mufti on the panel in the programme as to why there
is a huge communication gap between the madrasa-educated ulema and Muslim
women. Why do women still hesitate to speak to the ulema? Surely, I felt,
they needed to if they were to convey to each other their concerns, about
issues that are so central to ongoing, and seemingly endless, debates about
Islam and women. Surely, something had to be done to help bridge the
enormous gap between women, including activists working for Muslim women's
rights, and the ulema of the madrasas. Efforts had to be made to create
spaces and possibilities for dialogue and interaction between them.

The mufti's answer was simple: The ulema, too, are not comfortable talking
to women. When set against the historical reality that Muslim women spoke to
the Prophet directly, the answer did not fully satisfy me. I set upon the
task of exploring this issue on my own. I got this opportunity the same day.

That afternoon, I had an appointment to meet the editor of an ulema-run
English magazine in Mumbai that focuses mainly on Muslim social issues. I
had butterflies in my stomach to begin with, and was apprehensive about how
I would be received them. I felt my Deccani Urdu was no match for their
chaste language. Yet, I mustered sufficient up courage and walked alone
through the rain-washed lanes of Mumbai to keep the appointment.

My initial fears were soon put to rest as I engaged in a meaningful dialogue
with the ulema team of the magazine. Their courtesy and hospitality
overwhelmed me. The fact that they sat on the same dastarkhan and had lunch
with me was by itself a path-breaking event. I offered the early afternoon
prayers in their office, after which they showed me around, exchanging ideas
about Muslim media and about their own magazine, which is unique in some
respects, being the only English magazine in the entire country staffed by
madrasa-educated ulema.

Sitting in that office, listening to the maulanas and sharing with them my
own views, I realized the need for conscious efforts to be made to bridge
the gap between the ulema and Muslim women. There is a desperate need for
forums whereby Muslim women and the ulema can interact, exchange views and
learn from each other's experiences in a spirit of genuine sharing. From
that dialogue, who knows, might emerge possibilities of helping bring Muslim
women out of that 'dangerous triangle' that invisiblised and silenced all
their issues and concerns by framing discourse about them simply in terms of
arbitrary divorce, polygamy and the veil. Sadly, the need for that dialogue
is too easily brushed aside by many of those involved in debates about
Muslim women who refuse to listen to other points of view—and these include
many women's activists and traditional ulema alike.

*Nigar Ataulla *is the Associate Editor of the Bangalore-based magazine
'Islamic Voice'. She can be contacted on [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 OR

Read in the url below

http://www.countercurrents.org/ataulla050808.htm

2.
*Rs 5,500 Cr plan to uplift poor Muslims in India*

*New Delhi:* India's Muslim outfit, The Jammat-e-Islami Hind (JIH) has
planned a Rs 5,500 crore action plan to improve the socio-economic
conditions of poor Muslims in the country.

The fund, to be generated through donations, will be spent mainly to improve
education, health and housing facilities of the poor Muslims across the
country.

Alarmed by the findings of the Justice Rajinder Sachar Committee, which
painted a dismal picture of the socio-economic conditions of Muslims in
India, the Jammat intends to build an international technical university
costing Rs 500 crore.

The estimated cost of establishing a student hostel in each state as well as
10 centres of higher learning has been pegged at Rs 900 crore.

All this is part of the Jammat's 'Vision-2016' aimed at providing free
quality education and health services to the poorest among India's
140-million-strong Muslims. The Indian Muslim population is the world's
third largest-after Indonesia and Pakistan.

"We are committed to achieve the objectives of Vision-2016 within the
stipulated period of time. Funds will be generated through donations," said
KA Siddiq Hassan, a retired university professor and vice-president of JIH,
which is headquartered in New Delhi.

Although the government has plans to improve the conditions of minorities,
it is increasingly felt that the community's lot will change for the better
only when Muslims activists and groups contribute their bit.

The Jammat's health agenda includes setting up a super speciality hospital
at an estimated cost of Rs 200 crore and 10 speciality hospitals with an
investment of Rs 800 crore.

"The process and planning for all the projects are going on smoothly.
Hopefully, the targets will be achieved. The total estimated cost for health
projects is around Rs 23,300 crore," Hassan said.

The Jammat has decided to construct 10,000 dwelling units in urban India for
Rs 600 crore while 100 model Islamic villages will also be developed by
2016.

"Each model village will have 100 houses, a primary and higher secondary
school, a clinic-cum-diagnostic centre, a community hall, a shopping complex
and a mosque," Hassan said.

The Jammat's 'Vision-2016' talks of total emancipation of poor Muslims.

"The Vision-2016 aims at imparting quality primary and secondary education
to the poorest among Muslims. We also intend to provide them health
facilities and financial assistance for economic empowerment," Hassan said.

The Rajinder Sachar report, submitted in November 2006, brought out the
prevalence of widespread illiteracy and poverty among minorities.

It said that 25 per cent of Muslim children in the 6-14 age group have
either never attended school or have dropped out. In premier colleges, only
one out of 25 under-graduate students and one out of 50 post-graduate
students is a Muslim.

The Jammat's initiatives are winning kudos.

"No community should depend on government aid for social, economic and
educational enhancement. If a community body comes out with a plan for
affirmative action, one should welcome such steps," Friends for Education
Group Chairman Firoz Bakht Ahmed said.

"There is not enough awareness that education can do wonders. Those
well-placed in the community must come forward to the rescue of those on the
margins," Ahmed added.

Reply via email to