Let me deconstruct two statements. First from Girish: > I wonder how you allow such a language and tone and that also for a woman.
I totally disagree. We are not talking about ordinary women here. These so called people are sort of 'Superwomen' with lots of press , social and political backing. So, as is always, any social figure must be subject to the grilling . But what was pointed out here is very very mild. Asking the moderator to interfere and cut such messages is the typical of selective misinformation. For the members , I say this. Many of my messages have not been even approved by the moderator here. I really take them in my stride. The second by Walter: I agree with Girish Mishra that such language is unacceptable. We have a right to our views but not to malign others and use such language. I request all the members what kind of language was used against some organisations and individuals here. Just go through the last twenty five mails and you will know. This is a public forum. So all views must be aired and published. Accepting or not is upto the members. I request the moderator to keep his views steady and push on. Venkat
