Times of India Mumbai; Date:2008 Sep 30; Section:Times Nation; Page Number 14  
SAFFRON RAGE 


Bajrang Dal flirting with terror? 



With Increasing Attacks On Churches, Demand For A Ban On Saffron Outfit Grows 
Louder 


Rajeev Deshpande | TNN 




   Aug 25: Two die in Kanpur when a bomb explodes. It transpires these were 
Bajrang Dal activists who were making explosives 
   Aug-Sept 2008: Spate of attacks on Christians in Orissa and Karnataka. 
Karnataka unit head Mahendra Kumar arrested. Home ministry says Bajrang Dal is 
behind the attacks 
   April 2006: Two Bajrang Dal activists died in Nanded while they were making 
bombs. The same group suspected to carrying out the 2003 Parbhani mosque blasts 
   
In Jan 1999, a Dal mob led by its local leader, Dara Singh, burnt alive Graham 
Stains and his two little sons in Orissa 
   
The Bajrang Dal is said to have been at the forefront of murderous gangs that 
killed Muslims and burnts their homes in Gujarat in 2002 
   
On several ocassions, Dal activists have acted as moral police, catching 
unmarried couples on Valentine’s Day and forcing them to apply sindoor or tie 
rakhi against their wishes 
   
The record of Bajrang Dal’s lawlessness is long. And now the Dal, the 
24-year-old sword-arm of the Hindutva brigade, is in the news again – as 
almost always, for the wrong reasons. A number of political leaders have been 
demanding its ban. Their argument: the Bajrang Dal, like groups such as SIMI, 
is an extremist organisation that are also flirting with terror. 
   
In the middle of September, anti-church violence erupted in Mangalore where 
prayer halls of the evangelist New Life order were attacked. Soon violence 
enveloped other denominations, and then churches in Bangalore were vandalized. 
A month earlier similar anti-Christian attacks rocked Orissa and trouble is 
still simmering there. 
   
In the middle of the violence that broke out in Mangalore was the figure of 
Mahendra Kumar, Bajrang Dal “convenor” for the state, who claimed 
responsibility for some of the attacks, and said they were a “spontaneous 
Hindu upsurge”. While the Dal said it was inflamed by New Life’s 
“conversion activities”, prayer halls were not the only targets. The 
Adoration monastry, where nuns live a cloistered life, dedicated to prayer, was 
not spared either, its windows broken and crucifix vandalized. 
   
Saffron groups and Christian organizations have clashed over conversions and 
re-conversions as they jostle for influence from remote tribal homelands of 
Rajasthan’s Banswara to the north-east. But every now and then, an orgy of 
violence breaks out. In August, the murder of pro-VHP Swami Laxmanananda 
Saraswati in Orissa’s western areas led to fierce clashes between tribal 
Kandhs and Dalit Panas, which are yet to die down. 
   
Strikingly at the forefront of many such acts of violence, are men with saffron 
headbands who seem to revel in their roles as saffron avengers, and claim to 
protect Hindu rights and privileges. Yet, their organisation, said to be 
affiliated to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad as a “youth wing”, remains shadowy, 
a free-floating franchise to be grabbed by any lumpen set looking to vent 
grievances that have included “cultural pollution” of young couples holding 
hands on Valentine’s Day. 
   
Who, or what, is Bajrang Dal? hinduunity.org, a website dedicated to 
“promoting and supporting the ideals of Bajrang Dal”, outlines the 
“threat” before Hindu samaj. “Christians have an upper hand with 
economies under their control, secondly petrodollars in hands of Muslims and 
thirdly, from within us, Hindus who falsely believe Hinduism can survive the 
onslaught in modern times as it has in the past.” 
   
The web page notes that “In times when Christians have openly taken on the 
task of harvesting us to Christianity, Muslims with their Jihad and the pseudo 
secularists, who will stop at nothing...very survival of Hinduism is at 
risk.” Its view of history is reflected in observations that Muslims should 
have taken “advantage” of the Partition of 1947, and left for other lands. 
   
Ever since Bajrang Dal was set up in 1984, ostensibly to protect a VHP 
programme for “awakening society’’, the outfit’s chain of command has 
been nebulous. It has had a few national convenors who have attracted notice 
like Jaibhan Singh Pawaiya, Vinay Katiyar and Surendra Jain, two of whom have 
been BJP MPs as well. The current convenor, Prakash Sharma, is less well known, 
but VHP claims the organisation is not as loosely structured as the popular 
impression is. 
   
As an organisation allied to the Sangh Parivar, it has come to be handy for 
channeling the fury of an underclass whose utility as foot soldiers is useful 
on occasion while allowing BJP to promptly dissociate itself from any 
outrageous act of violence. The Bajrang Dal and its cadre are like unwashed 
cousins at a family wedding who everyone pretends are not present at all, but 
who might have their uses in settling a land dispute. 
   
But Bajrang Dal does crash the party every now and again as Karnataka chief 
minister B S Yeddyurappa found out, after initial indulgence towards its lumpen 
mobs. As the BJP government hastily moved to arrest Dal workers last week, it 
did so as in response to political pressure and spiraling violence, after 
initially grumbling about “conversion activities” of church groups. This is 
because most Parivar leaders feel all church organizations are essentially 
engaged in “harvesting Hindu souls”. There is a failure to appreciate that 
many church orders are almost exclusively devoted to callings like education. 
   
But a senior RSS leader expressed concern over the attacks in Bangalore. “VHP 
or Bajrang Dal people are not involved in these incidents. But still they are 
happening,” he said. Almost any group of discontented young men were rallying 
under the Bajrang banner, indulging in hooliganism. The RSS would soon be 
deliberating on the issue. 
   
It is unclear whether RSS brass will actually check the Bajrang Dal but even if 
what the leader says is correct, it only shows that once violence is triggered, 
it is difficult to turn it off like a switch. And, given the profile that it 
has acquired, it is not easy to shrug off the Bajrang Dal’s actions. The BJP 
could not wish away Ashok Singhal & Co and VHP remains bitter over being 
“betrayed” by BJP on the Ram temple. 
   
Neither BJP nor RSS have ever tried to squarely face up to the need to define 
their relations with VHP or Bajrang Dal. Neither has disowned the Dal, even 
part of it. Would they disown the more obscurantist agenda of the two 
organizations? BJP has opted for a piecemeal strategy of going along with the 
view that VHP is a “cultural” organisation while looking the other way 
whenever the Bajrang Dal flexs its muscles. 
   
This is fairly typical of the RSS’s tactics in describing itself as 
completely apolitical. While it is true that RSS has a lot less direct interest 
or even facility with politics, it is far from being otherworldly. 


-
Dr Girish Mishra
 

 

Jharkhand Forum

Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum | Jharkhand Forum
  


SAFFRON RAGE

Bajrang Dal flirting with terror?


With Increasing Attacks On Churches, Demand For A Ban On Saffron Outfit Grows Louder

Rajeev Deshpande | TNN


   Aug 25: Two die in Kanpur when a bomb explodes. It transpires these were Bajrang Dal activists who were making explosives
   Aug-Sept 2008: Spate of attacks on Christians in Orissa and Karnataka. Karnataka unit head Mahendra Kumar arrested. Home ministry says Bajrang Dal is behind the attacks
   April 2006: Two Bajrang Dal activists died in Nanded while they were making bombs. The same group suspected to carrying out the 2003 Parbhani mosque blasts 
   
In Jan 1999, a Dal mob led by its local leader, Dara Singh, burnt alive Graham Stains and his two little sons in Orissa 
   
The Bajrang Dal is said to have been at the forefront of murderous gangs that killed Muslims and burnts their homes in Gujarat in 2002 
   
On several ocassions, Dal activists have acted as moral police, catching unmarried couples on Valentine’s Day and forcing them to apply sindoor or tie rakhi against their wishes 
   
The record of Bajrang Dal’s lawlessness is long. And now the Dal, the 24-year-old sword-arm of the Hindutva brigade, is in the news again – as almost always, for the wrong reasons. A number of political leaders have been demanding its ban. Their argument: the Bajrang Dal, like groups such as SIMI, is an extremist organisation that are also flirting with terror. 
   
In the middle of September, anti-church violence erupted in Mangalore where prayer halls of the evangelist New Life order were attacked. Soon violence enveloped other denominations, and then churches in Bangalore were vandalized. A month earlier similar anti-Christian attacks rocked Orissa and trouble is still simmering there. 
   
In the middle of the violence that broke out in Mangalore was the figure of Mahendra Kumar, Bajrang Dal “convenor” for the state, who claimed responsibility for some of the attacks, and said they were a “spontaneous Hindu upsurge”. While the Dal said it was inflamed by New Life’s “conversion activities”, prayer halls were not the only targets. The Adoration monastry, where nuns live a cloistered life, dedicated to prayer, was not spared either, its windows broken and crucifix vandalized. 
   
Saffron groups and Christian organizations have clashed over conversions and re-conversions as they jostle for influence from remote tribal homelands of Rajasthan’s Banswara to the north-east. But every now and then, an orgy of violence breaks out. In August, the murder of pro-VHP Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati in Orissa’s western areas led to fierce clashes between tribal Kandhs and Dalit Panas, which are yet to die down. 
   
Strikingly at the forefront of many such acts of violence, are men with saffron headbands who seem to revel in their roles as saffron avengers, and claim to protect Hindu rights and privileges. Yet, their organisation, said to be affiliated to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad as a “youth wing”, remains shadowy, a free-floating franchise to be grabbed by any lumpen set looking to vent grievances that have included “cultural pollution” of young couples holding hands on Valentine’s Day. 
   
Who, or what, is Bajrang Dal? hinduunity.org, a website dedicated to “promoting and supporting the ideals of Bajrang Dal”, outlines the “threat” before Hindu samaj. “Christians have an upper hand with economies under their control, secondly petrodollars in hands of Muslims and thirdly, from within us, Hindus who falsely believe Hinduism can survive the onslaught in modern times as it has in the past.” 
   
The web page notes that “In times when Christians have openly taken on the task of harvesting us to Christianity, Muslims with their Jihad and the pseudo secularists, who will stop at nothing...very survival of Hinduism is at risk.” Its view of history is reflected in observations that Muslims should have taken “advantage” of the Partition of 1947, and left for other lands. 
   
Ever since Bajrang Dal was set up in 1984, ostensibly to protect a VHP programme for “awakening society’’, the outfit’s chain of command has been nebulous. It has had a few national convenors who have attracted notice like Jaibhan Singh Pawaiya, Vinay Katiyar and Surendra Jain, two of whom have been BJP MPs as well. The current convenor, Prakash Sharma, is less well known, but VHP claims the organisation is not as loosely structured as the popular impression is. 
   
As an organisation allied to the Sangh Parivar, it has come to be handy for channeling the fury of an underclass whose utility as foot soldiers is useful on occasion while allowing BJP to promptly dissociate itself from any outrageous act of violence. The Bajrang Dal and its cadre are like unwashed cousins at a family wedding who everyone pretends are not present at all, but who might have their uses in settling a land dispute. 
   
But Bajrang Dal does crash the party every now and again as Karnataka chief minister B S Yeddyurappa found out, after initial indulgence towards its lumpen mobs. As the BJP government hastily moved to arrest Dal workers last week, it did so as in response to political pressure and spiraling violence, after initially grumbling about “conversion activities” of church groups. This is because most Parivar leaders feel all church organizations are essentially engaged in “harvesting Hindu souls”. There is a failure to appreciate that many church orders are almost exclusively devoted to callings like education. 
   
But a senior RSS leader expressed concern over the attacks in Bangalore. “VHP or Bajrang Dal people are not involved in these incidents. But still they are happening,” he said. Almost any group of discontented young men were rallying under the Bajrang banner, indulging in hooliganism. The RSS would soon be deliberating on the issue. 
   
It is unclear whether RSS brass will actually check the Bajrang Dal but even if what the leader says is correct, it only shows that once violence is triggered, it is difficult to turn it off like a switch. And, given the profile that it has acquired, it is not easy to shrug off the Bajrang Dal’s actions. The BJP could not wish away Ashok Singhal & Co and VHP remains bitter over being “betrayed” by BJP on the Ram temple. 
   
Neither BJP nor RSS have ever tried to squarely face up to the need to define their relations with VHP or Bajrang Dal. Neither has disowned the Dal, even part of it. Would they disown the more obscurantist agenda of the two organizations? BJP has opted for a piecemeal strategy of going along with the view that VHP is a “cultural” organisation while looking the other way whenever the Bajrang Dal flexs its muscles. 
   
This is fairly typical of the RSS’s tactics in describing itself as completely apolitical. While it is true that RSS has a lot less direct interest or even facility with politics, it is far from being otherworldly.

Reply via email to