*

It is 11 am. 12 year-old Sushil and his friends are playing "pitto" (a local
game) in the school premises. They are studying in class 6 at Manikdih
Middle School of Latehar district in Jharkhand, supposed to follow a 10 to 6
time table. 137 children of adjoining villages are enrolled in the school.
It has a provision of 3 teachers. But only two teachers are posted in the
school and one position is still vacant. In the last year, children received
the books four months before their final exams. The teachers are also
uncomfortable with the way school functions but they are helpless. Their
hopes lie on the midday meal, the only reason for children to go to school.

The school also has a village education committee consisting of 15 members,
formed in 2005, assigned to oversee the running of the school. But the
committee is also defunct. The chairperson of the committee, Kripal Singh
says that the members are just not interested and only 5-6 members turn up
in the meetings. Consequently, it has lost the legitimacy. Though the
villagers are not happy with the Khichidi (mixed rice) their children are
being served in the school, they fear having to forgo even this if they
question authorities.

This is the norm rather than exception among government schools in
Jharkhand. The spirit of the right to education is left to die in spite of
the central and the state governments spending a lot of money. The 'Total
Literacy Programme' is the most well-known government-sponsored education
programme, which universalises elementary education at the district level
encouraging community ownership of the school system. The programme is being
implemented by the Jharkhand Education Project Council in all 24 districts
of the state but there is little to show for it apart from the Khichidi.

The education system began to falter in 2002 when the Central Board for
Secondary Education (CBSE) was first introduced here. The latest status
report of the government says 40 lakh children did not get their books in
time. But 80 to 90 percent children still secured good marks and several
schools had all their students passing their exams. But, are good marks all
that the children need to survive in an increasingly competitive world?

While there is a hue and cry about unemployment, the status report shows
that 26 thousand teaching positions in the state are still vacant, 22
thousand of these are in primary schools, the rest in high schools.
Incidentally, the report states that 80 percent schools also do not have
head teachers. Among the 3 lakh children who dropped out from schools, 2
lakh did so in primary school, the rest after matriculation. The major
reasons for dropout are lack of livelihood, the uncertainty, and lack of
money for admission, books, and tuition fees.

Basic facilities are absent in 13,000 government schools of the state. Out
of these 5000 schools lack the basic requirements, 2000 schools do not have
own school buildings and are either run in private buildings, community
halls or Panchayat buildings. 6000 schools even lack the drinking water and
toilet facilities. The education minister of Jharkhand, Bandhu Tirkey says
that the government is working hard to provide the basic facilities to the
schools but the efforts are yet to bear fruit.

Under these circumstances, how can the poor children compete with the kids
of public schools? The present education system is widening of inequality
among the children, which is a severe threat to the society. The ministers,
bureaucrats and teachers are not serious in improving the quality of the
government schools because their kids do not study in these schools.

The government hoped to use the total literacy programme to achieve
universal elementary education—an opportunity to promote social justice
through basic education in the country. But even the midday meal could not
bring 4 lakh child labourers to school. A lakh of these have never been to
school.
The dual education system– one catering to the elites, another to the poor
–is what afflicts the government schools. The Kothari Commission (1964-66),
had introduced the concept of a common school system to address the issues
but it was never implemented. This is despite the Parliament declaring its
commitment to stick to the recommendations.

The common school system would only pave the way in improving the quality
education in the government schools, where the kids of the ministers,
bureaucrats, teachers, government officials and the poor study, play and eat
together. This would be the first step well-taken towards an egalitarian
society.
Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist associated with the "Child
Rights and You". He can be contacted at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main40.asp?filename=Ws041008no_brick.asp

Reply via email to