DEVADASIS – TIME TO REVIEW HISTORY

K. Santhaa Reddy,
Member, National Commission for Women


History seems to attract so much debate in India that possibly no one
wants  to talk about it. Devadasis form a part of our history. A part,
that we seem  to be ashamed to admit. Discussing something like this is
just not done in  good company. English-speaking society in India has
painted devadasis as  prostitutes. Governments are committed to
abolition of this "evil" practice,  which according to general
impression was a cover for religious prostitution.  Naturally, the civil
society of urban India would rather like to forget this  dark footnote
to Indian history or in some cases use it to just attack the
"uncivilized barbaric non-religion" called Hinduism.

No one else in history seems to have been as much misunderstood as
devadasis. No one has been as badly maligned as devadasis. There can be
no  other example of the truth being twisted in a most blatant manner.

The truth is that devadasis were an essential part of Indian temples.
They performed useful functions at temples like cleaning of temples,
lighting  lamps, dressing the deities etc. They sang devotional songs
and danced in  devotion to the deities. They taught music and dance to
girls. They kept  alive and developed a tradition of classical music and
dance. Beyond these  historical facts is a vast area of myths and false
propaganda.

When the Europeans first arrived in India, they were surprised to see
girls  who sang and danced in temples. They called these girls as
"nautch-girls". For  a European mind, a dancing girl could be
just an entertainer performing for  the pleasure of rich men. The idea
of art as an offering to God was unknown  to them. To their medieval
mindset, a dancing girl was showing off her body  and was no better than
a prostitute. Yet, there is no mention in any  historical book written
by early European visitors to indicate any evidence  of prostitution on
the part of "temple-maids" or "nautch-girls".

In 1892 an appeal was made to the Viceroy and Governor General of India
and to the Governor of Madras. The appeal for the first time mentioned,
"That there exists in the Indian community a class of women
community  commonly known as nautch-girls. And that these women are
invariably  prostitutes". The appeal was made by an organization
called "Hindu Social  Reforms Associations". This was a part of
"Anti-nautch movement". The people  behind the movement included
some missionaries.

The replies received from the Governor of Madras and from the Viceroy
denied the allegation that the "nautch-girls" were prostitutes.
Yet these  so-called reformists continued their "reform
movement". It was customary  in those days to invite devadasis to
every festivity in well-to-do families  for singing devotional songs and
for dancing. The so-called reformists started  campaigning against this
practice.

>From all historical records, it appears that till that point of time a
devadasi was a respected member of the community. She was considered
auspicious. A bead from her necklace was essential for the managalsutra
of any bride. (This practice continued till very recent times. At the
time  of my marriage, a bead was got from a devadasi). Such a respected
member of  the community was sought to be painted black and converted
into an immoral  prostitute.

No one knows the motivation behind maligning devadasis. Here was a poor
woman who was dependent on the community; who had hardly any land; who
had  no organization or support from the Government. She faced the
organized  power of the urban, educated groups who were backed by the
ruling class.  Her basic livelihood was threatened. She could do nothing
about it. Slowly,  she was left with no means to keep her body and life
together. In due  course, the malicious false statements became true.
Devadasi, left with no  other means of survival, had to become a
prostitute.

This was neither an easy journey nor was it complete. Many devadasis
took  to prostitution, but there were many more who resisted. A large
number took  on male patrons to whom they were generally loyal. Recent
surveys and studies  have confirmed that a majority of former devadasis
is engaged in some work  like agricultural labour or is working as
coolies.

Last year I visited Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra for
conducting public hearings on the subject of Devadasis. There were six
public hearings (two in each state). At every public hearing, the women
demanded that they should not be branded as prostitutes. They did not
know  that their demand involved undoing a propaganda carried out for
more than a  century. They are carrying on their struggle for dignity
well aware of the  fact that they belong to an institution on the verge
of extinction.

There is no doubt that the institution of devadasis is dying or is
almost  dead. It could not and should not have survived after temples
ceased to  occupy their place of glory. Yet, it survived and caused
untold misery to  the affected women. There are less than fifty thousand
devadasis (including  former devadasis) in the country today. Most of
them are not practicing any  of the customs associated with devadasis.
The institution of devadasis  cannot be revived since the supporting
institutions have ceased to exist.  Soon devadasis will be a subject of
history.

On their way to the pages of history, these women are demanding justice.
In an attempt to slander temples and Hinduism, these women were defamed
in  the worst possible way. The women who kept dances like Bharatnatyam
and  Odisee alive for centuries deserve a honourable mention in the
pages of  history.

While we recount the so-called reformist movement, we must also remember
the Revival Movement, which received strong support from Theosophical
Society of India. This movement did not revive the devadasi practice.
Instead it preserved the classical music and dance of devadasis. It was
due  to this movement that the art of Sadir (traditional dance of
devadasis in  Tamil Nadu) evolved into Bharatnatyam. Rukmini Arundale,
who took up the  cause of evolution of Sadir into Bharatnatyam, was
groomed and encouraged  by Annie Besant.

The present day devadasi is a shadow of her former self. She works as a
manual labourer and lives with a man who cannot or does not marry her.
She  needs our assistance to live a life of dignity. But even when we
extend the  hand to help her, let us give her due dignity that every
woman deserves. Let  us look at her with compassion rather than moral
condemnation.

The present day devadasi needs empathy and rehabilitation. But the
devadasi  in the pages of history needs neither of the two. She demands
her rightful  place as an artist as an upholder of classical arts. Let
us change our view  of history and get over the biases that our colonial
past has given us.  Restoring devadasis to their due place in history is
not a favour to  devadasis. We owe it to ourselves to be able to face
our own past without  shame or remorse.




K. Santhaa Reddy
Member,
National Commission for Women,
NEW DELHI





Reply via email to