Hi All

Private security in areas where there are sensitive social issues is a
matter of grave concern. But had it been a state-owned factory or mine it
would have been much the same. It is always the forest and the adivasi land
that has to bear the highest stake in "development" and be paid the least
for it. If we can tolerate mines on our land, in all fairness, cement
factories should be located in prime land in the heart of Bhubaneshwar,
Jamshedpur, Kolkata, Bombay. Encroach, if you need to, on the farmhouses of
ministers, and let cement silos and steel bar stockyards brush cheeks with
manicured lawns for a Naveen Patnaik, a Ratan Tata, an Anil Ambani or a
Buddhadeb Bhattacharya. If these guys lead by example we can think about
tolerating the mines if not the factories.

The reason for my angry diatribe is twofold.

One, when in West Bengal, the government bled taxpayers there to offer
subsidised arable land there was an enormous public discourse around it.
Well, amazingly none of the Bengali babus from Calcutta bothered to suggest
that the factory could be in Howrah or Barrackpur or any of the now defunct
industrial suburbs of the city. Not a single suggestion to hand over the
defunct factories in and around Calcutta. No talk about the rotting mills in
Bombay Central, Parel. No, these have to go their rightful inheritors, the
land sharks of the big city, right? I guess this Singur thing deeply shook
the implicit confidence of the middle class Bengali that the CPI-M led State
Government would never overstep its mandate from the middle class Bengali to
leave untouched what belongs to Bengalidom and would not have done a Singur
without evil corporate machination. That they would have uprooted some
expendible adivasis from their expendible homelands in Bankura and Purulia
instead. This is not to absolve Messrs. Tata and Bhattacharya of the Singur
mess-up, but Mr. Tata has shown us he is capable of much worse - Dhamra and
Kalinganagar. What astounds me is that we heard not even one tenth of the
noise that we heard about Singur on any of these issues, because there were
no bespectacled, be-kurta'd bong intellectuals from Coffee House Calcutta to
speak for them. The bottomline is, if we want industrialization, the
promoters should be willing to shell out money for realty in and around
cities so at least we can concentrate the pollution, congestion and noise
without messing up our environment and biological wealth. Or they have to
agree to operate with marginal ownership, 75% or more ownership being
equitably distributed among local stakeholders who would protect local
biological diversity and cultural survival. This, and not the typical
verbose and disgustingly holy platitudes we hear from industry and political
leaders, would actually make a difference.

Second, we tend to often miss the wood for the trees. These assaults on the
forests and the homelands of indigenous peoples began long before what has
now come to be known as corporate globalization or neoliberalism. India's
state led planned economy did the same - the discourse sounded different,
the vocabulary was different, the net effect was exactly the same, in fact
identical. At least in this age of neoliberalism, with some other factors
like cultural globalization and the huge expansion of ICT, there are people
talking about these injustices, and there is some space in the discourse for
the most marginal, the most vulnerable. If there were no cellphone, no
internet there would have been no space and opportunity to mourn Sushil
Lakra or pay tributes to his valour. This again, is not to absolve the
Tatas, Vedantas, POSO and Reliances of the world of their sins of commission
and ommission. Only to put things in perspective - making new bugbears won't
exorcise us of the old ones. It wasn't a Coca Cola which dammed the Narmada
but three state governments. It wasn't a Coca Cola that put pesticides in
ground water but Nehruvian socialism and state emphasis on chemical
intensive farming. And it wasn't a Coca Cola who forgot to compensate
displaced adivasi peoples for the Hirakud Dam pimped in children's textbooks
as the world's longest mud dam, just so the children of the next generation
think nation building was a good thing. I guess they missed out on a few
deviants in my generation, like me. Now in a rush to catch up with the new
'global' paradigm, they have possibly forgotten that this monumental edifice
to state-planned idiocy has run out of its life but the pople it displaced
are yet (unbelievable, but it's true!) to get paid for it.

Johar Sushil, my last respects to you. And Johar to the Lakra family and
clan, and to the other Oraon people of Lanjiberna.

Arnab Sen
Flat # 1024 Sector C Pocket 1
Vasant Kunj
New Delhi 110070 INDIA

Reply via email to