10 yrs after side effects of polio drop kills infant, court orders govt to pay 
Rs 2 lakh to family
(roughly $4,000, "plenty good for an Indian", huh?)

Utkarsh Anand Posted: Jan 05, 2009 at 0222 hrs
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/10-yrs-after-side-effects-of-polio-drop-kills-infant-court-orders-govt-to-pay-rs-2-lakh-to-family/406758/
 
[ Something is
better than nothing. There is no count of the number killed by the Oral
Polio Vaccine. The number paraylsed is around 80,000 as privately
acknowledged by doctors of the IMA, officially the figure is 65,000
upto 2006. This is a HUGE tragedy that has occurred despite all prior
warnings. Those who opposed and warned were dubbed "anti science" and
"against the interest of the nation". Now, in light of what has
happened, not only should the children be compensated and those
responsible punished but such misadventures should be prevented at any
cost. The ethical doctors can no longer remain mute witnesses.  The
time has come to understand polio and control it by tackling poverty,
malnutrition, unclean water, sanitation, pesticides and other
neurotoxins that have become part of our lives. - Jagannath]


New Delhi In a decision aimed
at making public authorities more accountable, a city court has
directed the Delhi government to pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation to the
parents of an infant who died after being administered with Pulse Polio
drops in 1999. The court held that the government was obligated to not only run
public health programmes like Pulse Polio, but was also duty bound to
protect people from the probable side-effects of the vaccine.

“The constitutional obligation of the Government to improve
public health is not confined to introducing programmes and
administering medicines but extends to protecting a child under such a
programme from all the consequential effects,” said Additional District
Judge (ADJ) Kamini Lau. Five-month-old Nishu started vomiting after she was 
vaccinated in Najafgarh on November 21, 1999.
By November 23, her condition deteriorated despite being given
medicines earlier at the Government Hospital in Zaffarpur. At 1.30 am,
her grandfather Rajpal rushed her to the hospital where, according to
the petition, the staff was found sleeping, and despite repeated
requests, a doctor was not called. Instead, Rajpal was asked to take
the child to the DDU Hospital. Suffering with acute respiratory distress and 
diarrhoea, Nishu succumbed on way to the DDU Hospital.

 “Authorities cannot shun their legal responsibility in
case a person falls sick or loses life after being administered with
medicines, for not only the improvement of public health but also the
protection of life is the primary duty of the government,” ADJ Lau said.
The court also criticised the condition of government hospitals in the Capital 
and asked the government to improve it.
“In any programme of immunisation involving administration of
drops, the possibility of side-effects cannot be ruled out and it is
necessary for the government to gear up its machinery to meet such an
eventuality,” ADJ Lau said. Rajpal led the legal fight on behalf of the child’s 
parents, accusing the government of negligence.


As many as six other children had fallen sick after being given
the polio drops during that period, indicating that something was wrong
with the vaccination programme. Challenging the petition, the government had 
said there was
neither any negligence in treating the child nor any fault with the
vaccinations in view of the report submitted by a high-powered
committee formed to look into the death of the child. ADJ Lau, however, 
observed that the facts on record spoke volumes about the circumstances that 
led to the death of the infant.
Taking strong exception to the manner in which the episode was followed by the 
government agencies, the judge said: “Was
it not necessary for the government to have instituted a high-level
probe rather than conducting eyewash investigations on the complaint of
Rajpal? This was necessary to reinforce the faith of the public in
government programmes meant for their welfare.”


ADJ Lau further questioned the government’s promise to provide
adequate health measures to everyone and said: “Why under these
circumstances does the government not gear up its machinery to meet
emergencies like the one in the present case?” The court further held that the 
programme was conducted in a
“casual” manner as not even the vials of the polio vaccines were
preserved for an in-depth inquiry at later stages.


Reply via email to